2018
DOI: 10.1101/323568
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative changes in solvent exposure identify cryptic pockets, conformational switches, and allosteric coupling

Abstract: Conformational changes can dramatically alter a protein's function by changing the surfaces that are accessible to interact with binding partners. However, it is often difficult to hone in on the most relevant conformational changes from the cartesian coordinates of atoms on the protein's surface. Instead, we describe a protein's surface in terms of groups of residues that undergo cooperative changes in their solvent exposure. We term these groups exposons. We demonstrate that Markov state models (MSMs) elegan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 77 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the opening of druggable cryptic allosteric sites can occur many orders of magnitude faster than the global unfolding process. 25,26 Thus, for biological questions where the underlying physical chemistry is irreducibly high-dimensional or the features in which it is low-dimensional are not known, building models with a large number of states is an effective strategy for ensuring that important states are not overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the opening of druggable cryptic allosteric sites can occur many orders of magnitude faster than the global unfolding process. 25,26 Thus, for biological questions where the underlying physical chemistry is irreducibly high-dimensional or the features in which it is low-dimensional are not known, building models with a large number of states is an effective strategy for ensuring that important states are not overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%