2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ivs.2016.7535411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooperative adaptive cruise control: An artificial potential field approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the SV needs to have accurate situational awareness of the surrounding obstacles in this range to plan safe trajectories. The authors in [20] mentioned that embedding driving rules and collision avoidance constraints within a multi-objective optimisation problem results in a control laws with large computation requirements. Furthermore, potential field-like functions for environmental perception can be shaped in such a way that it guides towards desired driving behaviour.…”
Section: Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the SV needs to have accurate situational awareness of the surrounding obstacles in this range to plan safe trajectories. The authors in [20] mentioned that embedding driving rules and collision avoidance constraints within a multi-objective optimisation problem results in a control laws with large computation requirements. Furthermore, potential field-like functions for environmental perception can be shaped in such a way that it guides towards desired driving behaviour.…”
Section: Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such approach is known to reduce fuel consumption and provide more comfort to the user, compared to the human control of vehicles [3]. By allowing the vehicles to share their motion and control information through wireless communication, the minimum allowable inter-vehicular time headway can be decreased [4], [5]. However, the wireless medium that is used to share this information is unreliable.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this safety-focused driver advice system, the relief of bottlenecks congestion has great potential to increase the capacity of lane closure areas to some extent, leading to mobility co-benefit. Another typical example of CAV applications which aims to improve both traffic flow and safety is the Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) system [17]. Dey et al presented an overall review of CACC system-related performance evaluation.…”
Section: A Vehicle-centric Cav Applications 1) Safety and Mobility Co-mentioning
confidence: 99%