While species ranges have always moved, the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of range expansions have become especially relevant today, as human influence reshapes ecosystems worldwide. As a consequence, there have been many attempts to explain and predict evolutionary and demographic dynamics observed during range expansions. However, many of these predictions are based, explicitly or implicitly, on a subset of possible range expansion types, so-called “pulled” dynamics, in which the low-density front populations provide most of the “fuel” for the advance. Some expansions may exhibit very different dynamics, with high-density populations behind the front “pushing” the expansion forward. Studying the ecological and evolutionary consequences of pushed vs. pulled dynamics remains challenging, due to difficulties in reliably generating or identifying pushed and pulled waves in experimental or natural settings. Manipulations of the within-habitat quality to create Allee effects have successfully created pushed waves, but may only be applicable in some contexts. We here propose that manipulating, and specifically reducing the degree of structural connectivity among habitats may prove a more generalizable way to create pushed waves, through density-dependent dispersal. We demonstrate this using both individual-based simulations as well as replicated experimental range expansions (with the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma brassicae as model). Analysing expansion velocities and neutral genetic diversity, we showed that restricting connectivity did lead to pushed dynamics. Interestingly, our results suggest that reducing connectivity led to density-dependent spread (and thus pushed waves) through two different mechanisms in simulated and experimental expansions. In the current context of habitat loss and fragmentation, we need to better account for this relationship between connectedness and expansion regimes to be able to successfully predict the ecological and especially evolutionary consequences of range expansions.