Cooperation, dialogue and ethics

Allwood, Jens; Traum, David; Jokinen, Kristiina

doi:10.1006/ijhc.2000.0425

Cited by 48 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A dialogue is a two-way process of communication among agents. In their framework, Allwood (1997) and Allwood et al (2000) discuss aspects of dialogue as cooperation, expressive and evocative functions, and obligations. Negotiation dialogue is fundamental in the negotiation process towards a negotiation agreement.…”

Section: Communication Dialogue and Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation

Shakun

2008

Group Decis Negot

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Difficult polarizing problems/conflicts are pervasive in the United States and the world. Welcome to spiritual rationality/connectedness problem solving and negotiation involving spirituality and rationality, and emphasizing connectedness in problem solving. In particular, we develop CPSN-ESD-Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation (CPSN) through Evolutionary Systems Design (ESD)-discussing spiritual rationality/connectedness and highlighting connectedness with One and with each other as values, among others, in problem solving. In CPSN-ESD, CPSN is effected through ESD, a game-theory based, general formal systemsspirituality modeling/design framework for individual and multiagent (group) problem solving and negotiation implemented by computer technology. Problem solving is represented by an evolving problem system of purposes and their relations from the lowest-level action to the highest purpose, ultimate common ground-spirituality, connectedness with One (or a surrogate, as discussed). For an agent, an evolved problem system satisfying spiritual rationality identifies right action (a solution) producing spirituality, connectedness with One (or a surrogate). A negotiation agreement requires multiagent agreement on the action to be taken. Agents may be natural or artificial. The paper focuses mostly on human agents with ideas being applicable to other natural and artificial (computer) agents with lesser (or greater) capabilities than humans according to their built-in capabilities. Present-to-future CSPN-ESD work includes furthering support of human agents; designing spiritual agents; designing multiagent systems for connectedness capitalism; developing connectedness democracy; further research and applications on intercultural and international negotiation; work on the world connected.

show abstract

Section: Communication Dialogue and Negotiationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation

Shakun

2008

Group Decis Negot

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kraus (1996, 1999) focus on planning and formulate the concept of &&shared plans'' as an elaborate combination of individual and shared intentions, and constraints for how the plans can be achieved. Finally, Allwood (1976) develops a theory of ideal cooperation which takes into account the notion of ethical consideration (for an overview see Allwood, Traum & Jokinen, 2000). Jokinen (1997) has built central concepts to express ideal cooperation, characterized by a suitable combination of actions driven by the competence ascribed to the agents and by the mutual consideration required by the agents' social interaction.…”

Section: Cooperation Collaboration and Conflict In Formal Theories Omentioning

confidence: 99%

Tailoring inference-rich descriptions through making compromises between conflicting cooperation principles

Horacek

2000

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…• studies discussing the role of stereotypes in interethnic conflicts and miscommunication across nations (Verevkin, 2009;Minyar-Belorucheva & Pokrovskaya, 2012;Mishlanova & Sirotkina, 2013;Malkova, 2007;Gladkova, 2013bGladkova, , 2015Petrova et al, 2014;Contini, 2013;Elchardus & Spruyt, 2014;Loennqvist et al, 2014;Ivanic, Bates & Somasundaram, 2014, and others) • studies focusing on issues of in-group and out-group trust and the impact of trust and other psychological phenomena upon interethnic relations (Alesina & La Ferrara, 2002;Abanes, Scheepers & Sterkens, 2014;Gundelach, 2014;Bahry et al, 2005;Allwood, Traum & Jokinen, 2000, and others) • studies identifying social prerequisites for interethnic confrontation, such as the degree of diversity in the society (Alesina & La Ferrara, 2002;Gladkova, 2013a;Matsaganis, Katz & Ball-Rokeach, 2011;Vartanova, 2005Vartanova, , 2012 and the role of social categorization in provoking conflicts and misunderstanding (Ufkes et al, 2012) • studies examining personal characteristics and their role in multicultural communication, including respondents' pride in belonging to a certain ethnic group and its influence upon their tolerance toward other ethnic formations (Ward et al, 2006), as well as individuals' level of education, income, and gender and age characteristics, etc. ; • studies discussing issues of migration and the lack of sense of belonging among migrants as a potential risk factor in a multiethnic society (Osin & Konstantinov, 2014;Bazhenova et al, 2015); • studies analyzing the role of language and linguistic means, including hate speech, in affecting attitudes toward ethnic groups (Shulumba, 2013;Malkova, 2007).…”

Section: * Corresponding Author E-mail: Gladkova_a@listrumentioning

confidence: 99%

Examining the public’s exposure to reports about ethnic groups in mainstream Russian media

Гладкова¹,

Коробейникова²

2016

Psych. Rus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article examines the exposure of Russian public to reports about ethnic groups in current mainstream Russian media by analyzing the amount of such reports today, as well as results of an online survey (n = 1040) aimed at revealing to what extent the public is indeed exposed to them by the respondents' own estimations. The survey showed that generally users tend to lack information about ethnicities in mainstream media and demonstrate a certain interest in learning more about other ethnic groups in Russia through media channels. We argue thus that the public's exposure to information about ethnic issues, although relatively high on a quantitative level (i.e., in terms of the actual number of reports), is lower on a qualitative one (i.e., the share of the respondents who actually come across such reports). The paper also reveals a number of tendencies from analyzing users' age groups and their regions of living. In general, we believe that singling out both specifics of the public's exposure to information about ethnicities and the connection between this exposure and the public's attitudes toward ethnicities (which is planned as the second stage of the current research project) may contribute to better understanding of the effects media can have on their audience in terms of agenda-setting and psychological influence. The current research can also be of interest when discussing the role mass media play in building harmonious relationships between representatives of different ethnic groups in a multiethnic society such as the Russian one.

show abstract

Cooperation, dialogue and ethics

Cited by 48 publications

References 23 publications

Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation

Connectedness Problem Solving and Negotiation

Tailoring inference-rich descriptions through making compromises between conflicting cooperation principles

Examining the public’s exposure to reports about ethnic groups in mainstream Russian media

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About