Cooperation across Organizational Boundaries: Experimental Evidence from a Major Sustainability Science Project

Abstract

Engaged research emphasizes researcher-stakeholder collaborations as means of improving the relevance of research outcomes and the chances for science-based decision-making. Sustainability science, as a form of engaged research, depends on the collaborative abilities and cooperative tendencies of researchers. We use an economic experiment to measure cooperation between university faculty, local citizens, and faculty engaged in a large sustainability science project to test a set of hypotheses: (1) faculty on the sustainability project will cooperate more with local residents than non-affiliated faculty, (2) sustainability faculty will have the highest level of internal cooperation of any group, and (3) that cooperation may vary due to academic training and culture in different departments amongst sustainability faculty. Our results demonstrate that affiliation with the sustainability project is not associated with differences in cooperation with local citizens or with in-group peers, but that disciplinary differences amongst sustainability faculty do correlate with cooperative tendencies within our sample. We also find that non-affiliated faculty cooperated less with each other than with faculty affiliated with the sustainability project. We conclude that economic experiments can be useful in discovering patterns of prosociality within institutional settings, and list challenges for further applications.

Cooperatives exhibit greater cooperation than comparable businesses: experimental evidence

“…Most research on human cooperation in the last few decades has focused establishing the theoretical possibility of cooperation and altruism (Nowak, 2006), demonstrating that humans do, in fact, have prosocial and cooperative tendencies (Rand and Nowak, 2013), comparing human prosociality between cultures (Henrich et al, 2010(Henrich et al, , 2004, or with other species including ants and termites. Very little research has used human cooperation to understand organizational relationships and dynamics (but see Waring et al, 2016Waring et al, , 2014. Following the research on evolution of human cooperation (Henrich, 2015), we suggest that all organizations rely on cooperation of their constituents in some domains to some extent.…”

“…Nonetheless, very little empirical research has been conducted on the patterns of cooperation in different types of organizations (e.g. Tremblay and Waring, 2015;Waring et al, 2014).…”

Incentive Model Based on Cooperative Relationship in Sustainable Construction Projects

“…These projects are typically characterized by multidisciplinary collaboration, the early intervention of contractors, the liquidity of construction processes, and the objective's ambidexterity of stakeholders. Therefore, inter-organizational cooperation is essential to a balanced approach towards sustainability [10][11][12]. Sustainable construction is an adaptive complex system that requires the cooperation of numerous stakeholders during the different stages of a construction project [13].…”

Community Science for Coastal Acidification Monitoring and Research

“…These actions may require sustained, coordinated activities among individuals, scientists, nonprofit organizations, industry, and regulatory agencies, collectively spanning organization and cultural boundaries. Pluralistic engagement with this novel environmental hazard can help catalyze solutions-oriented approaches which extend beyond the scientific assessment of environmental concerns to also include the social, political, and technological dimensions of solving problems associated with OCA (Miller et al 2014;Waring et al 2014). Extensive water monitoring that can assess local conditions, discern heterogeneous drivers, and inform local adaptation is a necessary precondition for governance structures tasked with responding to OCA (Tilbrook et al 2019).…”