2018
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aac74e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooper-pair splitting in two parallel InAs nanowires

Abstract: We report on the fabrication and electrical characterization of an InAs double-nanowire (NW) device consisting of two closely placed parallel NWs coupled to a common superconducting electrode on one side and individual normal metal leads on the other. In this new type of device we detect Cooper-pair splitting (CPS) with a sizeable efficiency of correlated currents in both NWs. In contrast to earlier experiments, where CPS was realized in a single NW, demonstrating an intrawire electron pairing mediated by the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They rely on high-efficient Cooper pair splitting into the two quantum wires, which arises due to strong e-e interactions. We note that efficient Cooper pair splitting [15,16] and a transparent interface with a superconductor has been recently demonstrated in self-assembled InAs nanowires [17,18] and quantum well [19]. With this outlook, providing wires with both strong e-e interactions and strong SOIs seems beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…They rely on high-efficient Cooper pair splitting into the two quantum wires, which arises due to strong e-e interactions. We note that efficient Cooper pair splitting [15,16] and a transparent interface with a superconductor has been recently demonstrated in self-assembled InAs nanowires [17,18] and quantum well [19]. With this outlook, providing wires with both strong e-e interactions and strong SOIs seems beneficial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As a consequence, the MKPs proposed in this work are robust against TRS-preserving disorder. It is also worth pointing out that, in addition to the MKPs, our setup can work as a Cooper pair splitter-a source of spatially separated spin-entangled electron pairs [106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118]. Finally, we remark that detection of MKPs with the parity-controlled 2π Josephson effect, which gives distinct signatures from unpaired MBSs [119], and braiding-based [120,121] or measurement-based [122] quantum computation schemes utilizing MKPs have been widely discussed in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Experimentally, these transitions should be observable when one avoids fixing the phase externally (for instance using a flux loop), but rather let the phase be determined based on energetic considerations. In particular, if the TRITOPSs in the junction are re-alized by a semiconductor-superconductor heterostructure [16,28,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53], it is important to avoid direct coupling between the parent superconductors, as this can give rise to a Josephson coupling that competes with the mechanism studied above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%