“…Given the relatively low surface gravity of δ Cep (log g=1.91 in cgs units, i.e., ∼0.30% that of the Sun), its high inferred mass-loss rate (up to Ṁ ∼ 10 −6 M yr −1 ), the presence of circumstellar H i 21 cm emission, and the rather low outflow velocity estimated for the wind (V out ≈ 35 km s −1 ), Matthews et al (2012) postulated that δ Cep's wind is likely to be predominantly cool and neutral (see also Holzer & MacGregor 1985;Glassgold & Huggins 1983). Nonetheless, the pulsations suspected of driving Cepheid outflows (e.g., Willson & Bowen 1986) are predicted to generate shocks that may propagate beyond the photosphere and lead to partial (and time-variable) ionization of the wind (Fokin et al 1996;Marengo et al 2002;Nardetto et al 2006;Belova et al 2014). In this case, free-free emission may be detectable at centimeter wavelengths from the partially ionized wind.…”