1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-821x(85)80009-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooling and contamination of mafic and ultramafic magmas during ascent through continental crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0
4

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
104
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Friction factor values are taken between 0.02 and 0.06 [Huppert and Sparks, 1985], which for the considered range of conduit diameters correspond (based on the Moody diagram [Moody, 1944]) to mean heights of roughness of the pipe ε c (Figure 2) from~1 cm to~50 cm. Figure 9 shows the calculated time lengths needed to flush 1.0 × 10 6 m 3 of magma for the considered ranges of conduit diameters and friction factors.…”
Section: 1002/2013jb010895mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Friction factor values are taken between 0.02 and 0.06 [Huppert and Sparks, 1985], which for the considered range of conduit diameters correspond (based on the Moody diagram [Moody, 1944]) to mean heights of roughness of the pipe ε c (Figure 2) from~1 cm to~50 cm. Figure 9 shows the calculated time lengths needed to flush 1.0 × 10 6 m 3 of magma for the considered ranges of conduit diameters and friction factors.…”
Section: 1002/2013jb010895mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From considerations of thermal budgets and fluid dynamics relevant to injection of high-temperature komatiite (Longhi et al, 1983;Arndt and Jenner, 1986), the crustal contamination model has gained strong support (Huppert and Sparks, 1985). Nevertheless, it is evident that this type of SHMB generally has spinifex texture similar to typical komatiites (Sun and Nesbitt, 1978;Zhou et al, 2002;Polat et al, 2006b), and is commonly intercalated with the coeval komatiite (Arndt et al, 1987;.…”
Section: Assimilation-fractional Crystallization (Afc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the extent of interaction between magmas and crustal rocks is not as simple as described by bulk assimilation or AFC processes, depending on several factors such as the structure of the plumbing system of the volcano and temperature and viscosity of magmas [38,39]. For instance, very hot and poorly viscous mafic melts may be able to dissolve larger amounts of crustal rocks than evolved magma, thus undergoing stronger isotopic modifications than felsic melts.…”
Section: Open-system Magma Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%