The exhaust of power and fusion-reaction products from ITER plasma are critical physics and technology issues from performance, safety, and reliability perspectives.
PrefaceThere aremany classes ofproblems which must be addressedtomake controlled thermonuclearfusion a viableoption for energy production. Among the most .pressing, from performance,safety,, reliability,, and timeliness perspectives, are issuesassociated with the exhaustfrom the plasma of power and fusion-reaction products. Components designedtoaccomplishthesetasksforITER can only do so .marginally. Their application to a demonstration power plant is not considered probable. Serious doubts and uncertainties exist on both physics and engineering levels.A major reason for this poor situation is the very limited attention given to these power and panicle control issues in comparison with the efforts expended on core plasma confinement.Now that an extensive database for the core plasma has been established through two decades of focussed research supplemented by special task forces, e.g., the transport initiative, tokamak scientists throughout the world fusion program are expanding their interests into the edge plasma region. Extensive studies of divertors have started, highlighted by on-going ADP experiments on DIII-D and ALT-II studies on TEXTOR, and soon-to-start divertor experiments on ASDEXUpgrade, JET, JT-60U, and Alcator-Cmod.These may well answer those difficult edge physics questions raised by the ITER team and its predecessors on INTOR, Starfire, UWMAK, and other rector designs.There remain, however, technical challenges that cannot be answered in the present generation of tokamaks because of inadequate pulse lengths, fluences, .fluxes, or other parameters. Awareness of these deficiencies has led several groups of scientists to propose technology facilities to address these issues. The purpose of this Technical Requirements Documents is to present to the fusion community a coherent and complete description of the capabilities a technology test facility should have to address these divertor issues. Only through an aggressive technology test program, can adequate safety and reliability be attained.Part of this document is tutorial in that it explains why certain parameter values must be achieved. The choice of these parameters and their values are set by the detailed design requirements for the ITER device. This document grew out of results and discussions presented in a series of DOE-sponsored ITER workshops held at Princeton University's Plasma Physics Laboratory during 1989 -1991. I wish to thank Dr. Marvin Cohen of the US Department of Energy for his encouragement and direction in the preparation of this report.
Samuel A. CohenPlasma Physics Laboratory Princeton University June 1991
Evaluation of the ITER divertor designThe US National ITER-CDA Review Panel reached the following conclusions: 1. The present divertor design is "marginally capable of achieving the ITER objectives." 2. Added "margin of assurance for achieving the tes...