2022
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cooking Particulate Matter: A Systematic Review on Nanoparticle Exposure in the Indoor Cooking Environment

Abstract: Background: Cooking and fuel combustion in the indoor environment are major sources of respirable suspended particulate matter (RSPM), which is an excellent carrier of potentially harmful absorbed inorganic and organic compounds. Chronic exposure to RSPM can lead to acute pulmonary illness, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and lung cancer in people involved in cooking. Despite this, questions remain about the harmfulness of different particulate matter (PM) sources generated during cooking, and the factors infl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as these events are related to ergonomic factors, it is indeed important to emphasize the distinction between correct behavior and unintentional error; such conditions can also occur, for example, due to an imbalance between the progress of mechanization and the operator's understanding of procedures; This can lead to the well-known error categories according to Rasmussen, i.e., errors due to practical oversights carried out in a way that is different from what was planned (slip), environmental distractions that occur when a task is frequently performed but is not due to habit, errors due to established habit or memory (lapse), failure in the judgment process of planning the action (rule-based mistakes) due to correct identification of the situation but the incorrect application of the rule, errors related to incomplete or incorrect knowledge and incorrect assessment of the situation (knowledge-based mistakes) [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as these events are related to ergonomic factors, it is indeed important to emphasize the distinction between correct behavior and unintentional error; such conditions can also occur, for example, due to an imbalance between the progress of mechanization and the operator's understanding of procedures; This can lead to the well-known error categories according to Rasmussen, i.e., errors due to practical oversights carried out in a way that is different from what was planned (slip), environmental distractions that occur when a task is frequently performed but is not due to habit, errors due to established habit or memory (lapse), failure in the judgment process of planning the action (rule-based mistakes) due to correct identification of the situation but the incorrect application of the rule, errors related to incomplete or incorrect knowledge and incorrect assessment of the situation (knowledge-based mistakes) [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggest that personal exposure should be measured instead in order to obtain true exposure and effect of emissions from cooking and usage of range hood while cooking (72). Further, it might have been appropriate to have measured volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide and particulate matter (PM), as previous research has shown elevated levels of VOCs and PM due to cooking, use of ventilation (i.e., a range hood) (73), smoking indoors (74), and burning candles (75).…”
Section: Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the test scenarios, activities associated with indoor-like environments, such as "Staying inside work place", "Visiting other commercial place", and "visiting restaurants, cafe" showed higher ratios compared to those of outdoor-like environments, except "Home-BBQ" and "Pan-Frying". In general, activities such as indoor cooking are the main cause of household air pollution and a leading environmental risk factor [35]. Sometimes, the PM2.5 concentration level of the cooking activities has a spiky distribution, resembling outliers, which could explain the corresponding lower accuracy in cooking activities.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%