The Ecological Status of European Rivers: Evaluation and Intercalibration of Assessment Methods 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5493-8_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
175
0
43

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
175
0
43
Order By: Relevance
“…This monotonic relation seems to be expected in certain procedures of biological assessment based on macrobenthos identified mainly to the level of genera (e.g. Hering et al, 2006a). Bini et al (2014) found a unimodal distribution mode for the three indices of diversity against nutrient enrichment when stream invertebrates were identified to the genus level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…This monotonic relation seems to be expected in certain procedures of biological assessment based on macrobenthos identified mainly to the level of genera (e.g. Hering et al, 2006a). Bini et al (2014) found a unimodal distribution mode for the three indices of diversity against nutrient enrichment when stream invertebrates were identified to the genus level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The metrics are scaled to reference conditions or expectations for the lake classes, and any decision on subdivision should reflect the distribution of the scores for the reference sites. This paper proposes classes with equal ranges to provide five ordinal rating categories for assessment of impairment in accordance with the requirements of the European Water Framework Directive [53], that is, excellent (≥0.8), good (0.6-0.8), fair (0.4-0.6), poor (0.2-0.4), and bad (<0.2).…”
Section: Metric Standardization and Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The databases contain taxonomic structure of invertebrates sampled once at 750 streams and rivers across Poland between 2009 and 2011 and identified to the family level. All samples were collected at fixed sampling sites, processed in the laboratory and identified by RIEP staff, according to the established procedure (multihabitat method of macrobenthos sampling RIVECO, Bis and Mikulec, 2013) in accordance with the assumptions of AQEM and STAR projects (STAndardization of River classification À a European Commission Framework V project) (Furse et al, 2006;Hering et al, 2006) and the requirements of the Water Framework Directive (2000). The database also contains classifications of each sampling site into one of 26 abiotic types and into one of six biocoenotic types of watercourses based on the structure of benthic assemblages at reference sites (Bis and Mikulec, 2013).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMWPpl is the original version of the well-known index BMWP (Armitage et al, 1993) implemented to Polish conditions as the official method of biological assessment (Kownacki et al, 2004). Index MMI is a multimetric biotic index, developed in accordance with objectives of the project STAR (Furse et al, 2006;Hering et al, 2006) and is currently the official method of biological assessment of watercourses in Poland (e.g. Lewin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%