2019
DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Fracture Detection and Localization on Wrist Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the combined performance was on par with dermatologists and outperformed non-dermatologists. R-CNNs have been used in fracture detection in radiology [55] and the detection of the nail plate in onychomycosis [56]. Algorithms could potentially detect and diagnosis skin cancer without any preselection of suspicious lesions by dermatologists.…”
Section: Non-melanoma Skin Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the combined performance was on par with dermatologists and outperformed non-dermatologists. R-CNNs have been used in fracture detection in radiology [55] and the detection of the nail plate in onychomycosis [56]. Algorithms could potentially detect and diagnosis skin cancer without any preselection of suspicious lesions by dermatologists.…”
Section: Non-melanoma Skin Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research proposed a model based on Inception-ResNet and a Faster R-CNN architecture was accomplished as a final model. The proposed model was tested on a 524 radiographs of wrist [7]. Rajpurkar et al trained a 169-layer Dense as a base model to identify and localize bone disorders(abnormalities).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Detection of Fractures on Radiographs and CT Multiple deep-learning methods have been used to detect fractures on radiographs. Most studies have used open-source CNNs and large training datasets for detecting fractures in multiple body parts including the hip, [33][34][35][36] shoulder, 36,37 wrist, 36,[38][39][40] and ankle 36,41 using the interpretation of experienced radiologists as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance varied but was generally high for all studies, with AUCs ranging between 0.90 and 0.99, sensitivities ranging between 73% and 99%, specificities ranging between 73% and 97%, and accuracies ranging between 75% and 96% ( Table 2).…”
Section: Estimation Of Pediatric Bone Age On Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 99%