2017
DOI: 10.1117/12.2255710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural networks for an automatic classification of prostate tissue slides with high-grade Gleason score

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We Table 3: The network performance at the source domain. The two source networks both have better performance than [11].…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We Table 3: The network performance at the source domain. The two source networks both have better performance than [11].…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The comparison between the source network and the previous study [11] is shown in Table 3. From the results, we can see both of our models have better performance than [11]. However, the study at [11] uses less WSIs than ours and the network with the best performance reported in [11] is wider and deeper than our study.…”
Section: Experimental Validation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiménez del Toro et al (2017) describe a completely automatic segmentation and classification method for H&E-stained tissue images. The ground truth is extracted from pathologist's reports in the original diagnoses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was initially evaluated for classifying Gleason grades in prostate cancer, relying only on weakly annotated data, i.e., only using the global cancer grading of WSIs without any additional manual annotations in images. [16]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%