2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolutional neural network based encoder-decoder architectures for semantic segmentation of plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to recent report of Khan et al, 66 for semantic segmentation of prostate in T2W MRI, Deeplabv3 + showed improved segmentation performance as compared to FCN, SegNet, and Unet. In another report on leaf segmentation challenge dataset 67 , the Unet showed better segmentation results as compared to SegNet. Authors reported that the number of trainable parameters in SegNet and Unet were ~ 33.7 and 31 million, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to recent report of Khan et al, 66 for semantic segmentation of prostate in T2W MRI, Deeplabv3 + showed improved segmentation performance as compared to FCN, SegNet, and Unet. In another report on leaf segmentation challenge dataset 67 , the Unet showed better segmentation results as compared to SegNet. Authors reported that the number of trainable parameters in SegNet and Unet were ~ 33.7 and 31 million, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the past, numerous researchers implemented Adam optimizer (Bao et al, 2021;Gonzalez-Huitron et al, 2021;Waheed et al, 2020), used a learning rate of 0.001 (Gonzalez-Huitron et al, 2021;Kolhar and Jagtap, 2021;Zabawa et al, 2020), trained the models for one hundred epochs (Abdalla et al, 2019;Kolhar and Jagtap, 2021;Tassis et al, 2021;Zou et al, 2021) and achieved impressive results for agricultural images. Therefore, in the present study, models were trained for one hundred epochs having Adam optimizer (Kingma and Ba, 2017) as an optimization algorithm with a learning rate of 0.001 and a small batch size of ve images as recommended by (Kandel and Castelli, 2020).…”
Section: Training Of Cnn Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the performance evaluation of proposed neural networks and comparisons among these, segmentation results obtained using networks were quanti ed using well-known evaluation metrics for agricultural images: F1-score (Chen et al, 2021;Kestur et al, 2019;Kolhar and Jagtap, 2021), intersection-over-union (IoU) (Sun et al, 2021;Zabawa et al, 2020;Zou et al, 2021), mean intersectionover-union (mIoU) (Long et al, 2015;Tassis et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2020), pixel accuracy (Kestur et al, 2019;Kolhar and Jagtap, 2021;Tassis et al, 2021), precision (Kestur et al, 2019;Zabawa et al, 2020) and recall (Chen et al, 2020;Tassis et al, 2021;Zou et al, 2021) metrics. IoU metric as de ned by Eq.…”
Section: Evaluation Indexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the training weights achieved by neural networks were implanted into precision robots to remove weeds from field sugar beets. Many scholars have studied plant leaves through semantic segmentation ( Barth et al., 2018 ; Miao et al., 2020 ; Kolhar and Jagtap, 2021 ; Masuda, 2021 ). However, the conventional semantic segmentation network has a large number of parameters and needs a long training time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%