2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers

Abstract: We present a new formulation of Lagrangian perturbation theory which allows accurate predictions of the real-and redshift-space correlation functions of the mass field and dark matter halos. Our formulation involves a non-perturbative resummation of Lagrangian perturbation theory and indeed can be viewed as a partial resummation of the formalism of Matsubara (2008a,b) in which we keep exponentiated all of the terms which tend to a constant at large separation. One of the key features of our method is that we n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
410
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
11
410
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we will not use (A21) and instead calibrate the bias model following the procedure of [33,46] by treating the mass M appearing in (A20) as a free parameter and find the optimal mass M opt by fitting the TCLPT correlation function ξ X (r, M) with unspecified M to the HR2 real space correlation function. Once this optimal mass M opt is determined for each mass bin, the statistical averages ∂ n δ R F that also enter TCLPT expressions for v 12 (r), σ 2 ⊥ (r) and σ 2 || (r) will be identified with b n (M opt ) as suggested in [27,33,46]. Thus v 12 (r), σ 2 ⊥ (r) and σ 2 || (r) as well as the GSM redshift space correlation function ξ X (s) will then be determined without any further fits.…”
Section: Lagrangian Halo Density Field and Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore we will not use (A21) and instead calibrate the bias model following the procedure of [33,46] by treating the mass M appearing in (A20) as a free parameter and find the optimal mass M opt by fitting the TCLPT correlation function ξ X (r, M) with unspecified M to the HR2 real space correlation function. Once this optimal mass M opt is determined for each mass bin, the statistical averages ∂ n δ R F that also enter TCLPT expressions for v 12 (r), σ 2 ⊥ (r) and σ 2 || (r) will be identified with b n (M opt ) as suggested in [27,33,46]. Thus v 12 (r), σ 2 ⊥ (r) and σ 2 || (r) as well as the GSM redshift space correlation function ξ X (s) will then be determined without any further fits.…”
Section: Lagrangian Halo Density Field and Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not however that there is no a priori reason that the bias coefficients in the expansion (A19), used in this work, are similar to those appearing in (A18) in the limit S 0 → 0. Therefore we won't use (A21) and instead will assist the bias model following the procedure of [33,46] by treating the mass M appearing in (A20) as a free parameter and find the optimal mass M opt by fitting the theoretical model to the real space correlation function. Following [27,33,46], we will identify those fitted bias parameters with the statistical average F (n) = b n (M opt ) as they arise in integrated Lagrangian perturbation theory [27] and convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory [33].…”
Section: B Local Lagrangian Bias Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the truncated Post-Zel'dovich approximation (TPZA) with a smoothed initial power spectrum performs even better than TZA, compare [33,34]. We apply the framework of Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory (CLPT) developed in [35] which recovers the ZA at lowest order while providing an approximation to PZA at higher order. CLPT can be understood as a partial resummation of the formalism presented in [36] providing a nonperturbative resummation of LPT that incorporates nonlinear halo bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinearity in the power spectrum can be modeled using perturbation theory (PT) [19] and numerical simulations [20,21]. The nonlinearity of RSD was first modeled for dark matter [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], and the formalisms have been extended to dark matter halos [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Although detailed studies are required to fully understand halo bias [40][41][42][43], the theoretical models for the redshift-space power spectrum of halos were shown to work well up to reasonably small scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%