2002
DOI: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2002.tb00005.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conviction and Interpretation: Hiding and Seeking with Words

Abstract: A patient who was developing her career as a writer evolved a unique process of reading her fiction aloud during analytic sessions. This paper explores this unconventional approach and the inevitable illusions, fantasies, meaningful explanations, and creative fictions that form a part of every technical/theoretical choice. How do analysts reach an integrated, rather than a theory-led, sense of conviction about a theoretical/technical choice? The development of integrated conviction is illustrated by showing th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent literature this certainty has been described as conviction. Although it is difficult to concretely define conviction, it has been depicted as a belief in one's capacity to successfully integrate thinking and feeling and translate this into confident clinical decision making (Almond, 2003; Goldberg & Grusky, 2004; Grusky, 2002). According to Grusky (2002), the development of conviction is an ongoing “back and forth process which involves matching theory to a feeling-based clinical choice” (p. 88).…”
Section: Convictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent literature this certainty has been described as conviction. Although it is difficult to concretely define conviction, it has been depicted as a belief in one's capacity to successfully integrate thinking and feeling and translate this into confident clinical decision making (Almond, 2003; Goldberg & Grusky, 2004; Grusky, 2002). According to Grusky (2002), the development of conviction is an ongoing “back and forth process which involves matching theory to a feeling-based clinical choice” (p. 88).…”
Section: Convictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is difficult to concretely define conviction, it has been depicted as a belief in one's capacity to successfully integrate thinking and feeling and translate this into confident clinical decision making (Almond, 2003; Goldberg & Grusky, 2004; Grusky, 2002). According to Grusky (2002), the development of conviction is an ongoing “back and forth process which involves matching theory to a feeling-based clinical choice” (p. 88). To avoid confusion, it is necessary to differentiate the ongoing act of pursuing conviction with the possible end point of certainty or a sense of knowing.…”
Section: Convictionmentioning
confidence: 99%