2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.08676
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convexity Shape Prior for Level Set based Image Segmentation Method

Abstract: We propose a geometric convexity shape prior preservation method for variational level set based image segmentation methods. Our method is built upon the fact that the level set of a convex signed distanced function must be convex. This property enables us to transfer a complicated geometrical convexity prior into a simple inequality constraint on the function. An active set based Gauss-Seidel iteration is used to handle this constrained minimization problem to get an efficient algorithm. We apply our method t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let φ be a signed distance function of an object. Then in the level set method, a simple linear constraint φ 0 for the signed distance function φ can force the segmented region to be convex [13]. This is because the curvature κ = div( ∇φ |∇φ| ) in the implicit representation of the curves would be reduced to κ = φ when |∇φ| = 1 in terms of the proposition of signed distance function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let φ be a signed distance function of an object. Then in the level set method, a simple linear constraint φ 0 for the signed distance function φ can force the segmented region to be convex [13]. This is because the curvature κ = div( ∇φ |∇φ| ) in the implicit representation of the curves would be reduced to κ = φ when |∇φ| = 1 in terms of the proposition of signed distance function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To impose the convexity constraint, we require the Laplacian of the SDF is non-negative at the given set. The equivalence of these two conditions was proved in [32] and [25]. The second model we introduced is for the cases with outliers or noise, where the convex hulls do not have to enclose all the given points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], an Euler's elastica energy-based model was studied for convex contours by penalizing the integral of absolute curvatures. Recently, the continuous methods or curvature-based methods were developed further in [24,37]. For a given object in 2-dimensional space, it was proved in [37] that the non-negative Laplacian of the associated signed distance function [32] (SDF) is sufficient to guarantee the convexity of shapes.In [24], the authors also proved that this condition is also necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the continuous methods or curvature-based methods were developed further in [24,37]. For a given object in 2-dimensional space, it was proved in [37] that the non-negative Laplacian of the associated signed distance function [32] (SDF) is sufficient to guarantee the convexity of shapes.In [24], the authors also proved that this condition is also necessary. In addition, instead of solving negative curvature penalizing problems like [2,33,38], these two papers incorporated non-negative Laplacian condition as a constraint into the involved optimization problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation