1999
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46632-0_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convexifying Monotone Polygons

Abstract: The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comInternational audienceThis paper considers reconfigurations of polygons, where each polygon edge is a rigid link, no two of which can cross during the motion. We prove that one can reconfigure any monotone polygon into a convex polygon; a polygon is monotone if any vertical line intersects the interior at a (possibly empty) interval. Our algorithm computes in O(n2) time a sequence of O(n2) moves, each of which rotates just four joints at once

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to plan a set of constraints circumscribing a desired homotopy, metrics describing homotopy goodness must be defined and ascribed to individual triangles and 1 Methods for convexifying non-convex polygons described in [21], [22]. …”
Section: B Homotopy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to plan a set of constraints circumscribing a desired homotopy, metrics describing homotopy goodness must be defined and ascribed to individual triangles and 1 Methods for convexifying non-convex polygons described in [21], [22]. …”
Section: B Homotopy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A classical problem in computational geometry is that of convexifying simple polygons; that is, using a given fixed set of transformations that can be applied to the vertices and edges of P , try to transform P into a convex polygon in such a way that some properties of P are preserved. The first formulation of a problem of this kind was proposed by Erdős [4], who proposed a strategy to convexify a non-convex polygon by using flips; see also [1,2,3,5,9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions have been in the math community since the 1970's [22] and in the computational geometry community since 1991 [18,19], but first appeared in print in 1993 and 1995: [20] and [16, p. 270]. Initial computational geometry results focused on certain classes of configurations such as "visible" chains [4], star-shaped polygons [9] and monotone polygons [3]. Connelly, Demaine, and Rote have recently proved that in the plane, no chain or polygon is locked [7]; Streinu [28] provides an alternative proof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%