2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2006.08518
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex optimization based on global lower second-order models

Nikita Doikov,
Yurii Nesterov

Abstract: In this paper, we present new second-order algorithms for composite convex optimization, called Contracting-domain Newton methods. These algorithms are affine-invariant and based on global second-order lower approximation for the smooth component of the objective. Our approach has an interpretation both as a second-order generalization of the conditional gradient method, or as a variant of trust-region scheme. Under the assumption, that the problem domain is bounded, we prove O(1/k 2 ) global rate of convergen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For p = 1, this recovers well-known result about global convergence of the classical Frank-Wolfe algorithm [10,19]. For p = 2, we obtain Contracting-Domain Newton Method from [8]. Thus, our analysis also extends the results from these works to the case, when the corresponding subproblem is solved inexactly.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For p = 1, this recovers well-known result about global convergence of the classical Frank-Wolfe algorithm [10,19]. For p = 2, we obtain Contracting-Domain Newton Method from [8]. Thus, our analysis also extends the results from these works to the case, when the corresponding subproblem is solved inexactly.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our framework extends the initial results presented in [19] and in [8]. In [19], it was shown that the classical Frank-Wolfe algorithm can be generalized onto the case of the composite objective function [18] using a contraction of the feasible set towards the current test point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations