2021
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2020.3000176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convex Nonparametric Formulation for Identification of Gradient Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to Theorem 12 and Corollary 13, we know that this solution coincides with the solution of (23) provided that m ≥ m * . Nevertheless, compared to (23), the main optimization problem (19) has an additional constraint on the rank of resulting Hankel operator being finite. In the remainder of this section, we fill this gap by employing the notion of finite Hankel rank kernels.…”
Section: Proof See Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to Theorem 12 and Corollary 13, we know that this solution coincides with the solution of (23) provided that m ≥ m * . Nevertheless, compared to (23), the main optimization problem (19) has an additional constraint on the rank of resulting Hankel operator being finite. In the remainder of this section, we fill this gap by employing the notion of finite Hankel rank kernels.…”
Section: Proof See Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Theorem 16 offers a practical way to solve problem (39). Due to Theorem 12 and Corollary 13, we know that this solution coincides with the solution of (23) provided that m ≥ m * . Nevertheless, compared to (23), the main optimization problem (19) has an additional constraint on the rank of resulting Hankel operator being finite.…”
Section: Proof See Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to Lemma 5, we know that L u t : H k → R is a continuous linear map, for each t ∈ T . Therefore, function E D : H k → R, defined in (8), is a convex and continuous function. Since λ > 0, we know that J is a proper and lower semi-continuous strongly convex function.…”
Section: B the Estimation Problem In Stable Reproducing Kernel Hilber...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where E D is defined in (8). Also, we know that the feasible set in ( 29) is a subset of feasible set of (53).…”
Section: Towards a Tractable Schemementioning
confidence: 99%