Converting commercial and industrial property into rented residential accommodation: development of a decision support tool

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop a decision-making tool that assesses the economic feasibility of converting commercial and industrial buildings into rented residential accommodation. This tool also enables developers to provide high-quality rented residential accommodation that contribute to the gentrification of formerly industrialised inner city or developed areas. Design/methodology/approach The overarching epistemological approach adopted used inductive reasoning and a postpositivist philosophical design to structure the research problem and devise new theories about the phenomena under investigation. From an operational perspective, a two-phase “waterfall” research approach was adopted. Phase one used extant literature to identify development factors and variables for consideration, risks posed and conversion appraisal criteria. Two case studies formed the basis of a cross comparative analysis, namely, a new build and conversion of a former industrial building into rented residential accommodation. Phase two identified development appraisal criteria, conducted a cost analysis and premised upon the findings, developed a decision support appraisal tool as a “proof of concept”. Findings The research combined key decision factors and variables that assist property developers when evaluating whether to convert commercial and industrial property into rented residential accommodation. The appraisal tool’s functionality was validated via a focus group discussion with senior property developers to ensure that assessment criteria and development weightings were appropriate. Feedback revealed that the tool was suitable for purpose and should now be adopted in practice and refined as appropriate and with usage. Research limitations/implications The appraisal tool presented could yield a far more accurate means of decision-making which, in turn, could ensure that predicted investment returns are received (thus reducing errors and lowering risk for investors). Future work is required to robustly test and validate the tool’s accuracy in practice. It is envisaged that future projects will provide a rich stream of data for such testing. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this work constitutes the first attempt to conceptualise a decision support tool for rented residential property development.

Exploring the Contractual Arrangements Associated with the Adoption of the Modern Methods of Construction in the United Kingdom

“…This paper's findings suggest the existence of multiple contractual amendments when procuring MMC projects. Results reflect the tendency of such amendments to focus on liquidated damages and retention amounts, both of which align with Taylor et al (2022) discussions in the UK context. Overall, despite the findings suggesting the popularity of the standard forms, amendments exist nevertheless, and the original clauses are modified to reflect changes (Noruwa et al, 2022).…”

Mental Health Causation in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Review Employing a Psychological Safety Climate Model

“…As an iterative waterfall process was adopted [33,34], this research first defines the research scope, then searches for pertinent studies prior to analysing the search outcomes and categorising the results based on a psychological climate model developed by Hall, Dollard and Coward [9] (cf. Figure 1).…”

Developing a Reference Framework for Claim Management Office: A Multi-Method Approach of an International Construction Firm

“…: (1) identifying knowledge base elements of CMO (see Figure 1); (2) sampling and data collection; (3) data analysis (root causes analysis); (4) multiple triangulation-based validation. The research undertaken was governed by a strict ethical protocol guiding this work that included: anonymising all participants' demographic details; holding all information in a secure location and neither disseminating nor divulging to any third party without their express permission in writing; ensuring all participants could access results in aggregate form post research completion [85][86][87]. Thus, these four main steps of the methodology followed in this research are shown in Figure 2, and further details and clarifications are demonstrated in the following sub-sections.…”