2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2016.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converted phases from sharp 1000 km depth mid-mantle heterogeneity beneath Western Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
7
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sporadic and weak conversions are present between about 850‐km and 1,000‐km depth. Seismic layering in the lower mantle have been observed previously (e.g., Jenkins et al, ; Waszek et al, ), but there are no known mineral phase transitions that could account for these observations.…”
Section: Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Sporadic and weak conversions are present between about 850‐km and 1,000‐km depth. Seismic layering in the lower mantle have been observed previously (e.g., Jenkins et al, ; Waszek et al, ), but there are no known mineral phase transitions that could account for these observations.…”
Section: Receiver Functionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding a possible deeply held prejudice that has slowed understanding, the old‐timers—Francis Birch, Keith Bullen, Norman Haskell, and surely others—might have put the boundary between the upper and lower mantle in the right place, near 1,000 km, and not at 660 km as most have accepted, after that depth seemed to fit with simple images of plate tectonics. Recently, many have suggested that a boundary at 1,000 km is the more important for geodynamics (e.g., Ballmer et al, , ; Čížková & Bina, ; Durand et al, ; Fukao et al, , ; Jenkins et al, ; Marquardt & Miyagi, ; Morra et al, ; Rudolph et al, ; Vinnik et al, ; Wen & Anderson, , ). I argue that a boundary at 1,000 km not only fits seismological data well but also allows greater isolation between the upper and lower mantle than has, until recently, been widely assumed but not total isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the bulk lower mantle (LM) is considered well mixed above the D ′′ layer, heterogeneities in Earth's LM have also been disclosed by studies of geochemistry and seismology (Jenkins et al, ; Romanowicz & Wenk, ). These heterogeneities include isotopically and chemically distinct components from basaltic volcanism (Hofmann, ), heavier‐than‐average materials down to the core–mantle boundary (Trampert et al, ), and a decrease in shear wave velocity by more than 1.5–2% beneath hot spot volcanoes (French & Romanowicz, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%