2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion to supportive care with biosimilar pegfilgrastim-cbqv enables budget-neutral expanded access to R-CHOP treatment in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over a decade ago, after the European approval of biosimilar epoetin alfa (Binocrit R ) and biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio R ), both manufactured by Sandoz (Holzkirchen, Germany), the authors initiated a series of cost-efficiency studies of the cost-savings associated with conversion from originator to biosimilar products, starting with biosimilars in supportive cancer care (epoetin alfa, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and, more recently, anticancer therapy with biosimilar trastuzumab [29]. Importantly these cost-efficiency analyses were complemented with simulations of the expanded access that could be purchased on a budget-neutral basis to (then) novel anticancer agents and regimens (rituximab, trastuzumab, obinutuzumab, pembrolizumab and R-CHOP [rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone]), as well as expanded access to additional biosimilar GCSFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a decade ago, after the European approval of biosimilar epoetin alfa (Binocrit R ) and biosimilar filgrastim (Zarzio R ), both manufactured by Sandoz (Holzkirchen, Germany), the authors initiated a series of cost-efficiency studies of the cost-savings associated with conversion from originator to biosimilar products, starting with biosimilars in supportive cancer care (epoetin alfa, filgrastim, pegfilgrastim) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and, more recently, anticancer therapy with biosimilar trastuzumab [29]. Importantly these cost-efficiency analyses were complemented with simulations of the expanded access that could be purchased on a budget-neutral basis to (then) novel anticancer agents and regimens (rituximab, trastuzumab, obinutuzumab, pembrolizumab and R-CHOP [rituximab, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone]), as well as expanded access to additional biosimilar GCSFs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%