2021
DOI: 10.1109/tps.2021.3075101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of Methane in Plasma of Pulsed Nanosecond Discharges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] In particular, the fast response of plasma reforming enables it to utilize the fluctuant renewable electricity and convert the electric energy to chemical energy through the endothermic reforming process with high energy efficiency. [24,25] Steam reforming of ethanol and methane for hydrogen production has been reported using various nonthermal plasmas, such as dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), [26][27][28] corona discharge, [29][30][31] microwave discharge, [32][33][34] and gliding arc discharge. [35][36][37] In terms of the hydrogen production rate and energy efficiency, it was found that warm plasmas (e.g., gliding arc and microwave) are better than cold plasmas (e.g., DBD and corona) at a comparable range of reactant conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] In particular, the fast response of plasma reforming enables it to utilize the fluctuant renewable electricity and convert the electric energy to chemical energy through the endothermic reforming process with high energy efficiency. [24,25] Steam reforming of ethanol and methane for hydrogen production has been reported using various nonthermal plasmas, such as dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), [26][27][28] corona discharge, [29][30][31] microwave discharge, [32][33][34] and gliding arc discharge. [35][36][37] In terms of the hydrogen production rate and energy efficiency, it was found that warm plasmas (e.g., gliding arc and microwave) are better than cold plasmas (e.g., DBD and corona) at a comparable range of reactant conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%