2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of human-selective PPARα agonists to human/mouse dual agonists: a molecular modeling analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that humans and rodents show great species differences in response to PPAR␣ agonist on transactivation assay (41,42). It has been demonstrated that two amino acid residues in helix 3 of the LBDs of PPAR␣ are major contributors to species differences in response to a PPAR␣ agonist (21,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that humans and rodents show great species differences in response to PPAR␣ agonist on transactivation assay (41,42). It has been demonstrated that two amino acid residues in helix 3 of the LBDs of PPAR␣ are major contributors to species differences in response to a PPAR␣ agonist (21,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large ligand-binding pocket of PPARa, which is able to accommodate a wide variety of fatty acid-derived molecules, is presumably the reason underlying such ligand promiscuity (Wang et al, 2004).…”
Section: Implications Of Ppara As a Target For Cannabinoidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…biocides, pesticides, plasticizers, flame retardants, industrial coatings, pharmaceuticals etc. ), for which the test method is intended to predict endpoint-specific toxicity (i.e., PPARα, PPARγ, adipogenesis), ii) receptor cross-talk in lipid homeostasis, and iii) be structurally relevant for the biological role of the endpoint, as shown for example with known natural or endogenous ligands, and in PPAR molecular modelling receptor ligand binding studies, as often conducted in drug discovery ( 31 , 53 58 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%