Conversion of failed internal fixation in proximal femur fractures using calcar-guided short-stem total hip arthroplasty

Afghanyar, Yama; Coutandin, M.; Schneider, Michael; Drees, Philipp; Kutzner, Karl Philipp

doi:10.1186/s10195-022-00655-6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 38 publications

(51 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the past two decades, short stem THA has been introduced [12,13]. Several short stems have been designed, including mid-short stem (engaging metaphysis and junction of the metaphysis and diaphysis), and ultra-short stem (engaging only metaphysis) [14,15]. The classification of short stems is controversial, and several classifications have been developed, considering the length, location of loading, osteotomy level, and implant fixation [16][17][18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revision of Failed Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Migliorini,

Coppola,

D’Addona

et al. 2024

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The current literature lacks studies which evaluate the failure of short stems in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the present clinical investigation reported our experience with the failure of short stems in THA, evaluating the causes of failure, survivorship, and the clinical outcomes of revision arthroplasty. Methods: The present study was performed according to the STROBE guidelines. This study was conducted at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery of the Humanitas Clinical Institute, Milan, Italy, between 2017 and 2022. All patients who underwent revision surgery of a previously implanted THA using a short stem were prospectively included in the present study. Surgeries were performed with patients in lateral position, using a minimally invasive posterolateral approach. The outcomes of interest were to report information on the type and survivorship of implants used for the revision surgery and evaluate the clinical outcomes and the rate of complications. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used for the clinical assessment were the Western Ontario McMaster Osteo-Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and related subscales of pain, stiffness, and function, and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: Data from 45 patients were retrieved. Of them, 31% (14 of 45 patients) were women. The mean age was 63.7 ± 13.9 years. The mean length of the implant survivorship was 6.2 ± 5.7 years. In total, 58% (26 of 45 patients) underwent revision of all components, 36% (16 of 45 patients) revised only the stem, and 1% (3 of 45 patients) received a two-stage revision. The mean length of the follow-up was 4.4 ± 1.5 years. The cup was revised in 58% (26 of 45) of patients. At 4.4 ± 1.5 years of follow-up, the WOMAC score was 3.5 ± 1.3 and the VAS was 1.2 ± 1.3. In total, 9% (4 of 45) of patients experienced minor complications. One patient used a walking aid because of reduced function. One patient evidenced muscular hypotrophy. Two patients experienced hip dislocations. All two dislocations were managed conservatively with repositioning in the emergency room under fluoroscopy. No patient needed additional revision surgery or experienced further dislocations. Conclusions: Revision surgery is effective and safe when a short stem THA fails. At approximately four years of follow-up, all patients were highly satisfied with their clinical outcomes. Despite the relatively high number (9%), complications were of a minor entity and were successfully managed conservatively.

show abstract