2000
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200006000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing for Fractures of the Shaft of the Femur in Multiply Injured Patients*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
95
0
16

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
95
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Brewster et al reported a 1.4 % rate of pin tract infection and a 5.5 % rate of deep infection in the group lengthening over a nail in a literature review [19]. Rates of infection have ranged between 1.7 % and 21 % and bony union rates were high when an intramedullary nail is inserted after initial use of external fixation for high-energy and open tibial fractures [20][21][22]. However, all the tibiae in our study were healthy and well-vascularized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brewster et al reported a 1.4 % rate of pin tract infection and a 5.5 % rate of deep infection in the group lengthening over a nail in a literature review [19]. Rates of infection have ranged between 1.7 % and 21 % and bony union rates were high when an intramedullary nail is inserted after initial use of external fixation for high-energy and open tibial fractures [20][21][22]. However, all the tibiae in our study were healthy and well-vascularized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Therefore, in most cases, an early elective conversion to an intramedullary stabilizing technique takes place, 17 although in retrospective studies, an infection rate up to 13.3% was reported. 18,19 The ability to safely nail the femur as an initial procedure would avoid many of these problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In approximately 5% of fractures of the long bones in the leg, the patient is 'physiologically unstable' after initial resuscitation because of coagulopathy, haemodynamic instability, raised intracranial pressure, vascular damage or injury to a solid organ. 87,88 The treatment of these life-threatening conditions takes priority over the orthopaedic injuries in the early stages, and the use of external fixation is advocated, dictated by the requirement for rapid temporary stabilisation of the fracture. If these patients survive, they are also at a much higher risk of ARDS within the first week after injury and it is important Summary of the previous English-language studies which have compared the effects of early operative stabilisation of the fracture (usually within 24 hours) with late or non-operative treatment on the incidence of post-traumatic respiratory complications.…”
Section: 84-86mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these patients also have evidence of SIRS and concerns have been raised about the safety of early reamed nailing because the procedure may act as a secondary 'hit', which may trigger the development of ARDS. 9,19,20,89 Modifications to the basic protocol of early reamed nailing have been examined including the use of temporary external fixation until the inflammatory response has settled or resuscitation is complete, 88,91 the employment of different methods of fixation such as unreamed nails 78,92,93 or compression plates, 94,95 or of techniques designed to reduce fat embolisation during reamed nailing including venting, 96 lavage of the medullary canal 86 or an altered design of reamer.…”
Section: 84-86mentioning
confidence: 99%