1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)00065-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of cysteine to formylglycine in eukaryotic sulfatases occurs by a common mechanism in the endoplasmic reticulum

Abstract: Sulfatases undergo an unusual protein modification leading to conversion of a specific cysteine residue into K Kformylglycine. This conversion is essential for catalytic activity. In arylsulfatase A the K K-formylglycine is generated inside the endoplasmic reticulum at a late stage of protein translocation. Using in vitro translation in the presence of transport-competent microsomes we found that arylsulfatase B is also modified in a similar way by the formylglycine-generating machinery. Modification depended … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
62
0
9

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
62
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, it is probable that a percentage of the expressed hrIDS remain inactive as a result of the non-modification of the Cys 84 because of the saturation of the FGly generating system as was suggested by Dierks et al (1998b). Since it has been demonstrated that prokaryotic system for the modification of Cys presents a similar specificity as the eukaryotic cells (Dierks et al 1998a;Dierks et al 1998b;Dierks et al 1999;Marquordt et al 2003;Berteau et al 2006), it is possible that different E. coli proteins (possibly not identified) used this system, saturating it (Henderson and Milazzo, 1979). Any way the function or saturation of FGly generating system, and the percentage of inactive hrIDS will have to be experimentally proved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our case, it is probable that a percentage of the expressed hrIDS remain inactive as a result of the non-modification of the Cys 84 because of the saturation of the FGly generating system as was suggested by Dierks et al (1998b). Since it has been demonstrated that prokaryotic system for the modification of Cys presents a similar specificity as the eukaryotic cells (Dierks et al 1998a;Dierks et al 1998b;Dierks et al 1999;Marquordt et al 2003;Berteau et al 2006), it is possible that different E. coli proteins (possibly not identified) used this system, saturating it (Henderson and Milazzo, 1979). Any way the function or saturation of FGly generating system, and the percentage of inactive hrIDS will have to be experimentally proved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Some authors has reported that depending of the type of sulfatase expressed, in some prokaryotes a percentage of the sulfatase produced, carry out the FGly residue at its active site; while another percentage did not; for example the 60% of the prokaryote arylsulfatase expressed under "strong induction conditions" carry out the FGly residue, while 40% remain as original amino acids coded in the DNA sequence (Dierks et al 1998a;Dierks et al 1998b). In our case, it is probable that a percentage of the expressed hrIDS remain inactive as a result of the non-modification of the Cys 84 because of the saturation of the FGly generating system as was suggested by Dierks et al (1998b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…active site (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). In the native enzyme FGly is present as an aldehyde hydrate carrying two geminal hydroxyls at its ␤-carbon that both participate in catalysis (10 -12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During synthesis of sulfatases this cysteine is incorporated into the nascent polypeptide (16). It is converted to FGly during or shortly after protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), as could be shown in an in vitro translation/translocation system comprising import-competent dog pancreas microsomes (16,17). The FGly modification is directed by an autonomous linear sequence motif (CXPSRXXX(L/M)TG(R/K/L)) that is located within the N-terminal 80 -120 amino acid residues of the sulfatases, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%