2007
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2007.03.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion of Carbonyl Sulfide Using a Low-Temperature Discharge Approach

Abstract: Carbonyl sulfide (COS) are usually yielded from the petrifaction industry or steel-making plants. In this study, a low-temperature radio-frequency (RF) plasma approach was used to destruct COS for removing sulfur. The results showed that at an inlet O 2 /COS molar ratio of 3, the removal efficiency of COS reached 98.4% at 20 W and 4000 N/m 2 , with the major product being SO 2 with small amounts of sulfur deposition. The removal efficiency of COS was lower in the H 2 -containing condition than in the O 2 -cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, high concentration of COS was successfully destructed and converted into other sulfur-containing products by adding H 2 or O 2 , or without an additive, utilizing a low-pressure RF discharge approach. Tsai et al (2007) show that no H 2 S was detected, which is very different from the traditional catalytic removal process, including COS hydrogenation (COS + 4H 2 = H 2 S + CH 4 + H 2 O) and hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 (COS + H 2 O → H 2 S + CO 2 ) (Tsai et al, 2007). Tsai et al (2007) indicated that the discharge approach replaced major product H 2 S with elemental sulfur that can be easily recovered with or without H 2 , and can avoid the requirement of the sequential Claus reaction in order to convert H 2 S into elemental sulfur.…”
Section: (6) Conversion Of Carbonyl Sulfide Using a Lowtemperature DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, high concentration of COS was successfully destructed and converted into other sulfur-containing products by adding H 2 or O 2 , or without an additive, utilizing a low-pressure RF discharge approach. Tsai et al (2007) show that no H 2 S was detected, which is very different from the traditional catalytic removal process, including COS hydrogenation (COS + 4H 2 = H 2 S + CH 4 + H 2 O) and hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 (COS + H 2 O → H 2 S + CO 2 ) (Tsai et al, 2007). Tsai et al (2007) indicated that the discharge approach replaced major product H 2 S with elemental sulfur that can be easily recovered with or without H 2 , and can avoid the requirement of the sequential Claus reaction in order to convert H 2 S into elemental sulfur.…”
Section: (6) Conversion Of Carbonyl Sulfide Using a Lowtemperature DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsai et al (2007) show that no H 2 S was detected, which is very different from the traditional catalytic removal process, including COS hydrogenation (COS + 4H 2 = H 2 S + CH 4 + H 2 O) and hydrolysis of COS and CS 2 (COS + H 2 O → H 2 S + CO 2 ) (Tsai et al, 2007). Tsai et al (2007) indicated that the discharge approach replaced major product H 2 S with elemental sulfur that can be easily recovered with or without H 2 , and can avoid the requirement of the sequential Claus reaction in order to convert H 2 S into elemental sulfur. However, due to the relatively low pressure, this approach is not currently practical (Tsai et al, 2007).…”
Section: (6) Conversion Of Carbonyl Sulfide Using a Lowtemperature DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Liao et al (2005) studied reaction mechanism of ethylene oxide at various oxygen/ethylene oxide ratios in an RF cold plasma environment and showed the main reactions for EO decomposition changed with a varying O 2 /EO ratio in the plasma system. Tsai et al (2007) studied conversion of carbonyl sulfide using a lowtemperature discharge approach and results showed that at an inlet O 2 /COS molar ratio of 3, the removal efficiency of COS reached 98.4% at 20 W and 4000 N/m 2 , with the major product being SO 2 with small amounts of sulfur deposition. The removal efficiency of COS was lower in the H 2 -containing condition than in the O 2 -containg one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%