2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40823-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion Method in Comparative Analysis of e-Banking Services in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there has been a large number of studies that explore e-commerce, e-banking, e-health, e-government, and e-learning (Chmielarz & Zborowski, 2013;Gil-Garcia, 2012;Hamid, Waycott, Kurnia, & Chang, 2015;Huang & Benyoucef, 2013;Koohang, Kohun, & DeLorenzo, 2013;Tarhini, Hone, & Liu, 2016;Ziemba & Papaj, 2013). However, the largest number of these studies is focused on examining ICTs from the point of view of enterprise and public administration, e.g., the usage of ICTs for improving relationships with customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there has been a large number of studies that explore e-commerce, e-banking, e-health, e-government, and e-learning (Chmielarz & Zborowski, 2013;Gil-Garcia, 2012;Hamid, Waycott, Kurnia, & Chang, 2015;Huang & Benyoucef, 2013;Koohang, Kohun, & DeLorenzo, 2013;Tarhini, Hone, & Liu, 2016;Ziemba & Papaj, 2013). However, the largest number of these studies is focused on examining ICTs from the point of view of enterprise and public administration, e.g., the usage of ICTs for improving relationships with customers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists in establishing the relations of each criterion in relation to other criteria, based on averaged distances from the potential maximum value previously established on the basis of a scoring method. A detailed description of the method together with the algorithm of its solution may be found in the authors' previous works (Chmielarz & Zborowski, 2013). The advantages of this method include: ̶ the ease of use (similar to the application of a scoring method) which results from the fact that in the survey, there are questions related to a subjective assessment of a particular element; ̶ in the case of a large number of evaluation criteria or alternatives there is no significant increase in the number of questions included in the questionnaire (as in the case of the AHP method); ̶ the possibility of an application of this method in the studies with the participation of non-experts in the field; ̶ there are no measures as e.g.…”
Section: 30%mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metoda ta polega na wyznaczeniu relacji każdego kryterium w stosunku do innych kryteriów, opartej na uśrednionych odległościach od potencjalnej wartości maksymalnej na podstawie wcześniejszej oceny punktowej. Szczegółowy opis metody wraz z algorytmem jej rozwiązania znajduje się w [Chmielarz, Zborowski 2013]. Do zalet metody należą: łatwość zastosowania (podobna do realizacji metody punktowej) wynikająca z faktu, iż w formularzu ankiety analogicznej jak w metodzie punktowej znajdują się pytania o subiektywną ocenę elementu; w przypadku uwzględnienia dużej liczby kryteriów oceny bądź alternatyw nie występuje znaczny wzrost liczby pytań ankiety, na które należy odpowiedzieć (jak w metodzie AHP); możliwość zastosowania metody w badaniach z udziałem osób niebędących ekspertami z danej dziedziny; nie występują miary, jak np.…”
Section: Opis Metody I Próby Badawczejunclassified