2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion factors for effective dose and organ doses with the air Kerma area product in hysterosalpingography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarity or not Clarity); imaging protocol (2D versus 3D); acquisition mode (fluoroscopy versus cine). This fact was already documented in previous studies related to cardiac (Bogaert et al 2008, Vano et al 2019 or non-cardiac procedures (Brambilla et al 2020, D'Alessio et al 2021. The different C-arm angulations, kV values, field size, geometrical factors, etc used during the procedures also impact on the DC ED_PKA values.…”
Section: Paediatric Patientssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Clarity or not Clarity); imaging protocol (2D versus 3D); acquisition mode (fluoroscopy versus cine). This fact was already documented in previous studies related to cardiac (Bogaert et al 2008, Vano et al 2019 or non-cardiac procedures (Brambilla et al 2020, D'Alessio et al 2021. The different C-arm angulations, kV values, field size, geometrical factors, etc used during the procedures also impact on the DC ED_PKA values.…”
Section: Paediatric Patientssupporting
confidence: 53%