2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2011.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion coefficients for superheavy elements

Abstract: In this paper we report on internal conversion coefficients for Z = 111 to Z = 126 superheavy elements obtained from relativistic Dirac-Fock (DF) calculations. The effect of the atomic vacancy created during the conversion process has been taken into account using the so called "Frozen Orbital" approximation. The selection of this atomic model is supported by our recent comparison of experimental and theoretical conversion coefficients across a wide range of nuclei. The atomic masses, valence shell electron co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…either by emitting γ rays or by internal conversion. The latter is generally much more likely for low-energy transitions in superheavy nuclei [30]. Since the time difference between α decay and subsequent electromagnetic decay is usually confined to a few hundred nanoseconds (denoted as 'prompt coincidence'), neither the DSSSD itself nor its conventional read-out electronics is able to distinguish between signals from α-particle or conversion electron interactions in a given pixel of the DSSSD.…”
Section: Russia Beams Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…either by emitting γ rays or by internal conversion. The latter is generally much more likely for low-energy transitions in superheavy nuclei [30]. Since the time difference between α decay and subsequent electromagnetic decay is usually confined to a few hundred nanoseconds (denoted as 'prompt coincidence'), neither the DSSSD itself nor its conventional read-out electronics is able to distinguish between signals from α-particle or conversion electron interactions in a given pixel of the DSSSD.…”
Section: Russia Beams Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transition energies from EADL have been replaced with values deduced from binding energies calculated at each propagation step using the RAINE Dirac-Fock code [42]. The RAINE code tends to slightly overestimate the binding energies of the inner shells and this results in some of the K Auger lines appearing above their experimental values [57, 58]. Transitions with negative energies, that is, energetically not allowed, were excluded.…”
Section: Pilot Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is tempted to interpret this spectrum as two γ-ray transitions of 194 and 237 keV and two Compton scattered events. Because of inner conversion arguments [34], both γ rays should have electic dipole, E1, character. Since the difference 237-194=43 is indicative for an excited rotational level with the same intrinsic structure, the level scheme displayed in Fig.…”
Section: Decay Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%