2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures

Abstract: Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures * If the monitoring devices are not designed to measure H 0 (3, X) or H p (3), H 0 (0.07, X) and H p (0.07) may be applied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are some very high skin doses due to low energy beta emitters [39], in the Chornobyl liquidators “photon energy spectra varied from one location to another and from one time period to another but were generally centered between 0.15 and 0.4 MeV” [32]. In the range of energy from 0.15 to 0.4 MeV, dose does not vary much with energy or from one organ/tissue to another [40]. Both blood and epithelial tissue are highly regenerative tissues with a continuous need for repopulation and a base of stem cells needed for lifetime renewal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are some very high skin doses due to low energy beta emitters [39], in the Chornobyl liquidators “photon energy spectra varied from one location to another and from one time period to another but were generally centered between 0.15 and 0.4 MeV” [32]. In the range of energy from 0.15 to 0.4 MeV, dose does not vary much with energy or from one organ/tissue to another [40]. Both blood and epithelial tissue are highly regenerative tissues with a continuous need for repopulation and a base of stem cells needed for lifetime renewal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion coefficients C j (T*) are considered according to Pelliccioni (2000) and Petoussi-Henss et al (2010).…”
Section: Assessment Of Spectral and Angular Constraints Of Sub-gle Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current article summarizes the methods implemented in the parent study (7) and applied in INWORKS to convert nuclear workers’ recorded doses to estimates of the mean absorbed dose to an organ of interest (i.e., D T ) or personal dose equivalent in soft tissue at a depth of 10 mm [i.e., H p (10)] (22, 23). Correction factors accounting for differences in dosimeter response to conditions of exposure have been modified from previous work (7) in accordance with recent recommendations from the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%