2015
DOI: 10.4137/aswr.s31924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conversion between Soil Texture Classification Systems using the Random Forest Algorithm

Abstract: This study focuses on the reclassification of a soil texture system following a hybrid approach in which the conventional particle-size distribution (PSD) models are coupled with a random forest (RF) algorithm for achieving more generally applicable and precise outputs. The existing parametric PSD models that could be used for this purpose have various limitations; different models frequently show unequal degrees of precision in different soils or under different environments. The authors present in this artic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assignment of relative weights to textural classes was based on expert judgment. The map was reclassified on the basis of the criteria proposed by De Lannoy et al (2014) and Cisty et al (2015), who considered hydric models with high precision algorithms and techniques.…”
Section: Soil Texture (St)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assignment of relative weights to textural classes was based on expert judgment. The map was reclassified on the basis of the criteria proposed by De Lannoy et al (2014) and Cisty et al (2015), who considered hydric models with high precision algorithms and techniques.…”
Section: Soil Texture (St)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree type ensemble algorithms were found to be successful in harmonizing different soil texture classification systems (Cisty et al, 2015) and prediction of soil bulk density (Chen et al, 2018;Dharumarajan et al, 2017;Ramcharan et al, 2017;Sequeira et al, 2014;Souza et al, 2016) but have not been intensively applied yet to derive input parameters for hydrological modelling (Koestel and Jorda, 2014;Tóth et al, 2014). Hengl et al (2018a) tested several machine learning algorithms (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topographical parameters were calculated with SAGA GIS tools (Conrad et al, 2015) based on the digital elevation model. For the mapping of soil hydraulic properties all covariates were harmonized, projected to the Hungarian Uniform National Projection system, rasterized if necessary and resampled to 100 m resolution.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%