1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-5408(96)00035-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converse method measurements of electrostriction coefficients in low-K dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sundar and Newnham presented detailed expressions for the coefficients f and g according to the Born-Mayer potential with which the electrostrictive coefficient Q was accurately calculated for a LiF crystal giving the value of 0.53 m 4 /C 2 , which is consistent with the experimental result. 57 The effects of the microscopic characteristics on the electrostrictive coefficient Q were further demonstrated with the degree order of the B-site cations in perovskite materials. Table III shows that the magnitude of the electrostrictive coefficient strongly depends on the level of orderdisorder in the B-site cation arrangement.…”
Section: A Microscopic Characteristics Versus the Electrostrictive Ementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Sundar and Newnham presented detailed expressions for the coefficients f and g according to the Born-Mayer potential with which the electrostrictive coefficient Q was accurately calculated for a LiF crystal giving the value of 0.53 m 4 /C 2 , which is consistent with the experimental result. 57 The effects of the microscopic characteristics on the electrostrictive coefficient Q were further demonstrated with the degree order of the B-site cations in perovskite materials. Table III shows that the magnitude of the electrostrictive coefficient strongly depends on the level of orderdisorder in the B-site cation arrangement.…”
Section: A Microscopic Characteristics Versus the Electrostrictive Ementioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strength of the electrostriction effect is characterized by the electrostriction coefficient M e : where Y is the Young's modulus 22. Values of M e range from ∼10 −24 m 2 /V 2 in materials with low dielectric constants ( ϵ <50), to 10 −16 m 2 ·V −2 for materials with high dielectric constant ( ϵ >1000) used in mechanical actuators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the possible reason may result from the electrostrictive effect of PZT films during reannealing treatment in AEF. Dielectrics will take on electrostrictive effect in the applied electric field [11], so the electrostrictive effect of PZT in AEF would lead to the alternating volume change of PZT film during reannealing treatment in AEF, and then gives another activation force of the local plastic deformation in the Pt layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%