Conversational Interfaces for Health: Bibliometric Analysis of Grants, Publications, and Patents

Abstract

BackgroundConversational interfaces (CIs) in different modalities have been developed for health purposes, such as health behavioral intervention, patient self-management, and clinical decision support. Despite growing research evidence supporting CIs’ potential, CI-related research is still in its infancy. There is a lack of systematic investigation that goes beyond publication review and presents the state of the art from perspectives of funding agencies, academia, and industry by incorporating CI-related public funding and patent activities.ObjectiveThis study aimed to use data systematically extracted from multiple sources (ie, grant, publication, and patent databases) to investigate the development, research, and fund application of health-related CIs and associated stakeholders (ie, countries, organizations, and collaborators).MethodsA multifaceted search query was executed to retrieve records from 9 databases. Bibliometric analysis, social network analysis, and term co-occurrence analysis were conducted on the screened records.ResultsThis review included 42 funded projects, 428 research publications, and 162 patents. The total dollar amount of grants awarded was US $30,297,932, of which US $13,513,473 was awarded by US funding agencies and US $16,784,459 was funded by the Europe Commission. The top 3 funding agencies in the United States were the National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Boston Medical Center was awarded the largest combined grant size (US $2,246,437) for 4 projects. The authors of the publications were from 58 countries and 566 organizations; the top 3 most productive organizations were Northeastern University (United States), Universiti Teknologi MARA (Malaysia), and the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS; France). US researchers produced 114 publications. Although 82.0% (464/566) of the organizations engaged in interorganizational collaboration, 2 organizational research-collaboration clusters were observed with Northeastern University and CNRS as the central nodes. About 112 organizations from the United States and China filed 87.7% patents. IBM filed most patents (N=17). Only 5 patents were co-owned by different organizations, and there was no across-country collaboration on patenting activity. The terms patient, child, elderly, and robot were frequently discussed in the 3 record types. The terms related to mental and chronic issues were discussed mainly in grants and publications. The terms regarding multimodal interactions were widely mentioned as users’ communication modes with CIs in the identified records.ConclusionsOur findings provided an overview of the countries, organizations, and topic terms in funded projects, as well as the authorship, collaboration, content, and related information of research publications and patents. There is a lack of broad cross-sector partnerships among grant agencies, academia, and industry, particularly in the United States. Our results suggest a need to improve col...

Conversational Agents for Health and Well-being Across the Life Course: Protocol for an Evidence Map

“…To comprehensively identify relevant keywords, we resorted to using a purposive sample of 13 literature reviews [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 18 , 20 - 29 ] and a review protocol [ 30 ] related to conversational agents for health and well-being. A total of 318 keywords were extracted.…”

“…In addition to this purpose, the evidence map independently serves a much-needed research endeavor—fostering collaboration in the field through an open-access resource. In their review on conversational interfaces for health, Xing et al [ 18 ] highlighted the need to improve collaboration among stakeholders in research and patent activities. To our knowledge, there is no open, searchable database on conversational agents for health—a resource that could foster collaboration by pinpointing expertise across international centers and networks.…”

Conversational Agents in Health Care: Scoping Review and Conceptual Analysis

“…Existing reviews on conversational agents focus on a certain subtype of agents such as virtual coaches [ 31 - 33 ] or embodied conversational agents (ECAs) [ 34 ] or on specific functionalities of these agents such as behavior change [ 35 ] or mental health applications [ 36 , 37 ]. Other reviews report solely on the technical aspects of conversational agents such as system architecture and dialogues [ 38 ] or on the funding component of health care conversational interfaces [ 39 ].…”

The Contribution of Spanish Science to Patents: Medicine as Case of Study

“…Scientific innovation is determined by science and technology which together determine the way forward, thus, research documents and patent literature can be used to characterize scientific and technological research in a quantitative, automatic and visual way [18]. Recent studies suggest the need to improve collaboration among private and public sectors and health care organizations in research and patent activities [19]. This sort of analysis, from scientific literature and patent search data, has shown as an example that bioinformatics technology is a valuable strategy to modify, synthesize, or recombine existing antimicrobial peptides to obtain drugs against tumors with high activity and low toxicity [20].…”