2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75866-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Converging Shocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the flow patterns that there is some difference between the two cases: as the cross-section of the water barrier is square (Figures 6, 7), and as the cross-section of the water barrier is circular (Figures 8, 9). Second pressure peaks correspond to blast wave oblique reflection with their subsequent interaction [15][16][17]. In fact, anything like "aerodynamic shadow" forms just after the pressure barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the flow patterns that there is some difference between the two cases: as the cross-section of the water barrier is square (Figures 6, 7), and as the cross-section of the water barrier is circular (Figures 8, 9). Second pressure peaks correspond to blast wave oblique reflection with their subsequent interaction [15][16][17]. In fact, anything like "aerodynamic shadow" forms just after the pressure barriers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, as the corresponding damage diagrams show [11][12], it is possible to reduce the damaging effect of the blast wave to an acceptable (safe for people and structures) level at a distance of 2-3 meters from the epicenter of a condensed high explosive (HE) up to several kilograms of TNT equivalent mass (kg TNT). The phenomenon of suppression of the blast-wave effects by relaxation multiphase material of abnormally high compressibility (Gelfand-Silnikov effect [6]) manifests itself especially clearly when it is necessary to provide explosion protection in confined spaces, under conditions of multiple reflection, interaction (with amplification) and focusing of shock and blast waves [9]. Therefore, numerical studies to optimize the composition of relaxation blast-absorbing material and to select the most effective designs of explosion-proof devices are quite relevant.…”
Section: Page Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a blast wave propagating in air encounters a rigid obstacle, such as the ground or another reflective surface, the impedance mismatch between air and the obstacle causes an increased pressure reflection back into the incoming flow of the blast wave (Apazidis and Eliasson, 2019; Ben-Dor, 2007; Cooper, 1937; Cullis, 2001; Prasanna Kumar et al, 2018). The reflected wave can exhibit overpressures between two and 13 times greater than the shock pressure of the unimpeded blast wave itself (Apazidis and Eliasson, 2019; Ben-Dor, 2007; Cooper, 1937). These reflected waves follow behind the initial wave and, due to their higher pressure, gradually catch up and coalesce with the initial, incident blast wave (Apazidis and Eliasson, 2019; Ben-Dor, 2007; Gault et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflected wave can exhibit overpressures between two and 13 times greater than the shock pressure of the unimpeded blast wave itself (Apazidis and Eliasson, 2019; Ben-Dor, 2007; Cooper, 1937). These reflected waves follow behind the initial wave and, due to their higher pressure, gradually catch up and coalesce with the initial, incident blast wave (Apazidis and Eliasson, 2019; Ben-Dor, 2007; Gault et al, 2019). Extreme underestimations of maximum overpressures are a consequence of assuming the Friedlander waveform is representative of blast wave behavior in confined environments (Cullis et al, 2016; Langenderfer et al, 2021; Rutter and Johnson, 2017; Sherkar and Whittaker, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%