2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent Validity of Three Measures of Reflective Function: Parent Development Interview, Parental Reflective Function Questionnaire, and Reflective Function Questionnaire

Abstract: Reflective function (RF) is defined as an individual’s ability to understand human behavior in terms of underlying mental states including thoughts, feelings, desires, beliefs, and intentions. More specifically, the capacity of parents to keep their child’s mental states in mind is referred to as parental RF. RF has been linked to adult mental health and parental RF to children’s mental health and development. The gold standard measure of RF is the interview-based Reflective Functioning Scale (RFS) applied to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(145 reference statements)
0
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, while providing evidence for the sensitivity of the PRFQ-I to specific psychopathology profiles in mothers, this study does not include any assessment of the validity or reliability of the PRFQ-I with other measures of reflective capacities. However, a recent study has provided encouraging results on the convergent validity between the PRFQ and PRF assessed with the RFS applied to the Parent Development Interview, although this was conducted in a low-risk, non-clinical sample [ 119 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, while providing evidence for the sensitivity of the PRFQ-I to specific psychopathology profiles in mothers, this study does not include any assessment of the validity or reliability of the PRFQ-I with other measures of reflective capacities. However, a recent study has provided encouraging results on the convergent validity between the PRFQ and PRF assessed with the RFS applied to the Parent Development Interview, although this was conducted in a low-risk, non-clinical sample [ 119 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hypermentalizing. Anis et al [ 119 ] recoded the PRFQ CMS and IC subscales’ scores to account for high scores being potentially indicative of PRF deficits. By this approach, new scores were created based on deviations from the sample mean IC and CMS scores, and results supported the notion that, concerning the IC and CMS subscales, average scores of PRF may indicate better PRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results achieved by respondents on both subscales of RFQ-8 could range from 0 to 3. RFQ showed good reliability in previous studies, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.70 or more [ 21 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Items are rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree. The PRFQ reliably and validly assessed parental reflective functioning ( Luyten et al, 2017 ; Anis et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%