2000
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2000.28.6.579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent Validity of the Depression-Happiness Scale With the Bradburn Affect Balance Scale

Abstract: The Affect Balance Scale (Bradburn, 1969), a measure which is very well established in the subjective well-being literature, containing measures of both positive and negative affect, was administered alongside the Depression-Happiness Scale to 67 undergraduate students. As predicted, higher scores on the DepressionHappiness Scale, indicating a higher frequency of positive feelings and a lower frequency of negative feelings, were significantly associated with higher scores on the Affect Balance Scale and the Af… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample questions include, “Were you pleased to have accomplished something?” and “Upset because someone criticized you?” In the current study, the positive subscale demonstrated an internal consistency of .53 and the negative subscale .61. These low reliability estimates are comparable to those in other studies using the scale (i.e., 0.37–0.47 for the positive scale and 0.50–0.67 for the negative scale) [37, 38]. However, despite the low reliabilities of the ABS, the scale has shown great promise in terms of test–retest coefficients ranging from acceptable to strong [36], is well established in the subjective well-being literature, and is often used to evaluate convergent validity with newly developed affect measures [38].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sample questions include, “Were you pleased to have accomplished something?” and “Upset because someone criticized you?” In the current study, the positive subscale demonstrated an internal consistency of .53 and the negative subscale .61. These low reliability estimates are comparable to those in other studies using the scale (i.e., 0.37–0.47 for the positive scale and 0.50–0.67 for the negative scale) [37, 38]. However, despite the low reliabilities of the ABS, the scale has shown great promise in terms of test–retest coefficients ranging from acceptable to strong [36], is well established in the subjective well-being literature, and is often used to evaluate convergent validity with newly developed affect measures [38].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These low reliability estimates are comparable to those in other studies using the scale (i.e., 0.37–0.47 for the positive scale and 0.50–0.67 for the negative scale) [37, 38]. However, despite the low reliabilities of the ABS, the scale has shown great promise in terms of test–retest coefficients ranging from acceptable to strong [36], is well established in the subjective well-being literature, and is often used to evaluate convergent validity with newly developed affect measures [38]. Additionally, in our model testing, we selected not to combine positive and negative affects into a single affective balance measure.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A number of studies have offered support for the convergent validity of the D-H S, reporting positive correlations with the positive affect (Lewis, McCollam, & Joseph, 2000), internal locus of control and self-esteem (Cammock, Joseph, & Lewis, 1994), happiness, and life satisfaction (Joseph & Lewis, 1998). The D-H S has also been found to be negatively correlated with depression, as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (Joseph, Lewis, & Olsen, 1996) and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Joseph & Lewis, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive affect was measured by a modified version of the Bradburn's Affect Balance Scale (ABS; Bradburn, 1969). Internal consistency for the ABS has been less than satisfactory, ranging from .19 to .75 (Bradburn, 1969; Lewis, McCollam & Joseph, 2000; Macintosh, 1998). Hence, four items that have been added in previous research to increase the scale's robustness (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%