2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent evolution in structural elements of proteins investigated using cross profile analysis

Abstract: BackgroundEvolutionary relations of similar segments shared by different protein folds remain controversial, even though many examples of such segments have been found. To date, several methods such as those based on the results of structure comparisons, sequence-based classifications, and sequence-based profile-profile comparisons have been applied to identify such protein segments that possess local similarities in both sequence and structure across protein folds. However, to capture more precise sequence-st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Melting temperature (T m ) compatibility of oligonucleotides was checked using Primer Express v3.0.1 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA). We conducted further in silico testing of species-specificity using the NCBI Primer-BLAST tool [48] and found no evidence of primer amplification outside the target genus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melting temperature (T m ) compatibility of oligonucleotides was checked using Primer Express v3.0.1 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA). We conducted further in silico testing of species-specificity using the NCBI Primer-BLAST tool [48] and found no evidence of primer amplification outside the target genus.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overview is lost if we force the data to fit in a linear structure. But if a linear ancestral genome is really needed, linearization techniques exist [ 38 ], even if we would argue for linearization techniques that also put into question the input data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not only assemble existing tools that handle evolution at different levels, but also report methodological novelties, like the zipping and unzipping processes to modify gene trees and linearize adjacency graphs. Using synteny information to construct gene trees is rarely achieved [ 36 ] and linearizing often only use cutting operations [ 39 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If none of zipping and unzipping succeeds in removing all such supernumerary adjacencies (it is possible that none of the hypotheses applies), then we remove as few adjacencies as possible so that only gene extremities with at most two adjacencies remain. This is achieved using a maximum matching technique described in [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%