2017
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1275819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergent and criterion validity of the CogState computerized brief battery cognitive assessment in women with and without breast cancer

Abstract: Objective Computerized tests have increasingly garnered interest for assessing cognitive functioning due to their potential logistical and financial advantages over traditional ‘pencil and-paper’ neuropsychological tests. However, psychometric information is necessary to guide decisions about their clinical and research utility with varied populations. We explored the convergent construct validity and criterion validity of the CogState computerized tests in breast cancer survivors, a group known to present wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of this study, we focused on two of the four tasks that test frontal lobe function: Detection (a test of psychomotor function and processing speed), and Identification (a test of attention). 43 , 44 This battery was chosen as the cognitive assessment instrument because of its reported test-retest reliability, 45 47 ease of administration, and low requirement for verbal skills or educational attainment. 48 , 49 The cognitive assessment was presented to participants on a laptop computer, under the supervision of a trained research coordinator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study, we focused on two of the four tasks that test frontal lobe function: Detection (a test of psychomotor function and processing speed), and Identification (a test of attention). 43 , 44 This battery was chosen as the cognitive assessment instrument because of its reported test-retest reliability, 45 47 ease of administration, and low requirement for verbal skills or educational attainment. 48 , 49 The cognitive assessment was presented to participants on a laptop computer, under the supervision of a trained research coordinator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This computerised battery ( 30 ) provided tasks of attention (Card Identification), executive functioning (Set Shifting), learning (Continuous Paired Associates), psychomotor function (Detection Test), and working memory (One-back Task). The tasks show good correlations to traditional neuropsychological assessments ( 30 ) even when measured in populations that exhibit subtle cognitive changes ( 31 ). The Cogstate records both accuracy (whether the trial was answered correctly) and speed (time to make a correct response) on a trial-by-trial basis, allowing calculation of accuracy, mean response time, and variability in response time (inconsistency) using intra-individual standard deviations, for each task assessed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 30-year-old professional footballer, was referred by a sport and exercise medicine physician (BM), who witnessed him "…have an absence seizure…" with a past history of at least 2 concussions in 2015, from which he recovered within 7 days "…with standard return-to-play protocols and cogstate testing…" [9][10][11]. At the time of referral he had: A normal MRI, normal ECG in sinus rhythm; normal full blood count, ESR, biochemical screen and blood sugar.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015 he was removed from play on 2 occassions, 24 weeks apart, where he was assessed and diagnosed with concussion and not allowed to return to play. On both occassions his symptoms resolved within 48 hours and he completed a return to play protocol and passed computerised cognitive testing using Cogstate [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%