2007
DOI: 10.1093/imanum/drl025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence rates for sparse chaos approximations of elliptic problems with stochastic coefficients

Abstract: A scalar, elliptic boundary-value problem in divergence form with stochastic diffusion coefficient a(x, ω) in a bounded domain D ⊂ R d is reformulated as a deterministic, infinite-dimensional, parametric problem by separation of deterministic (x ∈ D) and stochastic (ω ∈ Ω) variables in a(x, ω) via Karhúnen-Loève or Legendre expansions of the diffusion coefficient. Deterministic, approximate solvers are obtained by projection of this problem into a product probability space of finite dimension M and sparse disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
151
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
151
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the well known Stochastic Galerkin formulation (see e.g. [1,[7][8][9][10]). In this respect a Tensor Product polynomial space that contains all the N-variate polynomials with maximum degree in each variable lower than a given w ∈ N is not a good choice.…”
Section: Galerkin Polynomial Approximation In the Stochastic Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the well known Stochastic Galerkin formulation (see e.g. [1,[7][8][9][10]). In this respect a Tensor Product polynomial space that contains all the N-variate polynomials with maximum degree in each variable lower than a given w ∈ N is not a good choice.…”
Section: Galerkin Polynomial Approximation In the Stochastic Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two relevant polynomial approximation strategies that can be conveniently applied to the problem at hand are the Stochastic Galerkin [1,[7][8][9][10] and the Stochastic Collocation methods [2,[11][12][13], which are a projection technique and an interpolation technique, respectively. In this work, we reconsider the quasi-optimal Stochastic Galerkin method proposed in the previous work [3], and provide rigorous convergence results in the special case in which the analyticity region contains a polydisc in the complex plane C N .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse tensor product constructions have been shown to be highly effective in [35,6,5,30]. Given sufficient prior knowledge on the regularity of the solution, these methods can be tuned to achieve nearly optimal complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6,11,35], we consider random components that are linear in y ∈ Γ, 8) with R m ∈ L(V, W * ) for all m. Such operators arise e.g. if A is a differential operator that depends affinely on a random field and this fields is expanded in a series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the stochastic collocation method shares the approximation properties of the stochastic finite element method [6,41,15], making it more efficient than MCS. Choices of collocation points include tensor product of zeros of orthogonal polynomials [5,45], sparse grid approximations [17,32,40,45], and probabilistic collocation [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%