2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-007-0133-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of phase-field approximations to the Gibbs–Thomson law

Abstract: We prove the convergence of phase-field approximations of the Gibbs-Thomson law. This establishes a relation between the first variation of the Van der Waals-CahnHilliard energy and the first variation of the area functional. We allow for folding of diffuse interfaces in the limit and the occurrence of higher-multiplicities of the limit energy measures. We show that the multiplicity does not affect the Gibbs-Thomson law and that the mean curvature vanishes where diffuse interfaces have collided. We apply our r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…REMARK 2.3 In Section 7.2 of [28], the authors establish C 3,α regularity of the reduced boundary of critical points of E γ that arise in the limit ε → 0 of critical points of the Ohta-Kawasaki energy E ε,γ given in (1.3).…”
Section: Regularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REMARK 2.3 In Section 7.2 of [28], the authors establish C 3,α regularity of the reduced boundary of critical points of E γ that arise in the limit ε → 0 of critical points of the Ohta-Kawasaki energy E ε,γ given in (1.3).…”
Section: Regularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will encounter this observation again in our numerical examples for small values of . For additional considerations of Γ− limits of this type see [31] and especially [11]. In the following we use the Willmore functional to detect local instabilities in finite time of transition solutions of (1.1) for small values of << 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it is known that for a family u ε of local minimizers of u ε with uniformly bounded energy must converge, up to subsequences, in L 1 -sense to a function of the form χ E − χ E c where χ denotes characteristic function, and ∂E has minimal perimeter. Thus the interface between the stable phases u = 1 and u = −1, represented by the sets [u ε = λ] with |λ| < 1 approach a minimal hypersurface, see Caffarelli and Córdoba [12,13], Hutchinson and Tonegawa [37], Röger and Tonegawa [65] for stronger convergence and uniform regularity results on these level surfaces.…”
Section: American Mathematical Society and International Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%