29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 1990
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1990.204046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of approximation schemes for fully nonlinear second order equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
385
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(392 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
385
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[7,21]) in 2-D by treating the Monge-Ampère equation and Pucci's equation as a constraint and using a variational criterion to select a particular solution. Very recently, Oberman [30] constructed some wide stencil finite difference scheme which fulfill the convergence criterion established by Barles and Souganidis in [3] for finite difference approximations of fully nonlinear second order PDEs. Consequently, the convergence of the proposed wide stencil finite difference scheme immediately follows from the general convergence framework of [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[7,21]) in 2-D by treating the Monge-Ampère equation and Pucci's equation as a constraint and using a variational criterion to select a particular solution. Very recently, Oberman [30] constructed some wide stencil finite difference scheme which fulfill the convergence criterion established by Barles and Souganidis in [3] for finite difference approximations of fully nonlinear second order PDEs. Consequently, the convergence of the proposed wide stencil finite difference scheme immediately follows from the general convergence framework of [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very recently, Oberman [30] constructed some wide stencil finite difference scheme which fulfill the convergence criterion established by Barles and Souganidis in [3] for finite difference approximations of fully nonlinear second order PDEs. Consequently, the convergence of the proposed wide stencil finite difference scheme immediately follows from the general convergence framework of [3]. Numerical experiments results were reported in [31,30,2,13], however, convergence analysis was not addressed except in [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to remark that, even in the case of non-negative velocity, our proof is new. However, the idea of our proof is inspired by the paper by Barles and Georgelin [5] on fronts driven by Mean Curvature where they prove convergence for a scheme in the framework of discontinuous viscosity solutions (we also refer to Barles, Souganidis [7] for convergence in the framework of continuous viscosity solutions). Basically, it is sufficient to consider a test function touching the upper semicontinuous envelope of the numerical solution (obtained as ∆x, ∆t go to zero) which violates the subsolution property and to derive from this some properties of the discrete solution for non-zero ∆x, ∆t.…”
Section: (12)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest approximations are finite difference schemes based on a Cartesian grid. In this class, monotone schemes are provably convergent [BS91], but only first order accurate [Obe06].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%