2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of approximate deconvolution models to the mean magnetohydrodynamics equations: Analysis of two models

Abstract: We consider two Large Eddy Simulation (LES) models for the approximation of large scales of the equations of Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD in the sequel). We study two α-models, which are obtained adapting to the MHD the approach by Stolz and Adams with van Cittert approximate deconvolution operators. First, we prove existence and uniqueness of a regular weak solution for a system with filtering and deconvolution in both equations. Then we study the behavior of solutions as the deconvolution parameter goes to infi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We now give the elements to prove our main result, ie, the existence of an inertial manifold to the system (24)- (27) (which is equivalent to (6)- (8) in the sense of Theorem 4.3 below.…”
Section: Spectral Gap Condition and Inertial Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We now give the elements to prove our main result, ie, the existence of an inertial manifold to the system (24)- (27) (which is equivalent to (6)- (8) in the sense of Theorem 4.3 below.…”
Section: Spectral Gap Condition and Inertial Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we consider the approximate deconvolution model, introduced by Adams and Stolz (see also previous studies); by following this scheme, we approximate the filtered bilinear terms as follows: (vv)true‾(DN(bold-italicvtrue‾)DN(bold-italicvtrue‾))true¯and(φv)true‾(DN(φtrue‾)DN(bold-italicvtrue‾))true¯, where v and φ play the role of the variables u and θ , respectively, and the filtering operator G α is defined by the Helmholtz filter (see, eg, other studies; see also Bisconti and Catania for an analogous case involving an anisotropic horizontal filter), with truefalse(0.1em·0.1emfalse)=Gαfalse(0.1em·0.1emfalse) and G α :=( I − α 2 Δ) −1 . Here, D N is the deconvolution operator, which is constructed using the Van Cittert algorithm (see, eg, Lewandowski) and is formally defined by DN:=truen=0Nfalse(IGαfalse)n2.05482ptwith2.05482ptNdouble-struckN. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We briefly present the main ideas of the proof ; for further details and extensions, and for a wider bibliography, see [3].…”
Section: Brief Sketch Of the Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity, we will present here just the first case with double filtering (see [3] for the other case). In order to handle better the approach with two filters, we will use the notation associated to the operators G i .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%