2016
DOI: 10.1080/00207160.2016.1227432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of alternating direction method for minimizing sum of two nonconvex functions with linear constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1b), and maximum inverse of the penalty paramenter 1 /β in ADMM ( Fig. 1c); comparison between our bounds (blue plot) and [26] for DRS, [24] for PRS and [18,19,23,25,35] for ADMM. On the xaxis the ratio between hypoconvexity parameter σ and the Lipschitz modulus L of the gradient of the smooth function.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b), and maximum inverse of the penalty paramenter 1 /β in ADMM ( Fig. 1c); comparison between our bounds (blue plot) and [26] for DRS, [24] for PRS and [18,19,23,25,35] for ADMM. On the xaxis the ratio between hypoconvexity parameter σ and the Lipschitz modulus L of the gradient of the smooth function.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The problem addressed in [19] is fully covered by our analysis, as they consider ADMM for (1.2) where f is L-Lipschitz continuously differentiable and B is the identity matrix. Their bound β > 2L for the penalty parameter is more conservative than ours; in fact, the two coincide only in a worst-case scenario.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a great deal of attention has been focused on using ADMM to solve nonconvex problems [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The work [26] studies the convergence of traditional ADMM under relatively strict assumptions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Weaker assumptions: Our assumptions are less restrictive in comparison with previous works on nonconvex ADMM (see, e.g., [26,27,28,30,31,32]). Specifically, we put much weaker restriction on function f (f i ) and matrix A (A i ).…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation