2017
DOI: 10.1142/s0218202517500312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of alternate minimization schemes for phase-field fracture and damage

Abstract: We consider time-discrete evolutions for a phase-field model (for fracture and damage) obtained by alternate minimization schemes. First, we characterize their time-continuous limit in terms of parametrized [Formula: see text]-evolutions, introducing a suitable family of “intrinsic energy norms”. Further, we show that the limit evolution satisfies Griffith’s criterion, for a phase-field energy release, and that the irreversibility constraint is thermodynamically consistent.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is satisfied for ϕ from (28a) with ε = 0 or from (32). The mentioned potential of the boundary-value problem (35)- (36) is…”
Section: Implicit "Monolithic" Discretisation In Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is satisfied for ϕ from (28a) with ε = 0 or from (32). The mentioned potential of the boundary-value problem (35)- (36) is…”
Section: Implicit "Monolithic" Discretisation In Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This viewpoint on the Ambrosio-Tortorelli model has also been taken in the rate-independent setting e.g. in [KN17], where the alternate minimization scheme (23) has been further iterated in each time-step leading to parametrized BV -evolutions of the rate-independent problem, and in [Neg16], where also a viscous regularization has been taken into account.…”
Section: Wwwgamm-mitteilungenorgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total cost of a transition ϑ : E → X at a jump time t is therefore 17) and the corresponding cost c for a jump from u(t−) to u(t+) passing through the value u(t) is given by 18) where the infimum is attained whenever there is at least one admissible transition with finite cost. Notice that the cost c is always bigger than the corresponding value computed by the dissipation distance d, i.e.…”
Section: Viscous Corrections Of the Incremental Minimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%