2019
DOI: 10.1002/num.22422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of a positive nonlinear control volume finite element scheme for an anisotropic seawater intrusion model with sharp interfaces

Abstract: We study a sharp interface model in the context of seawater intrusion in an anisotropic unconfined aquifer. It is a degenerate parabolic system with cross‐diffusion modeling the flow of fresh and saltwater. We study a nonlinear control volume finite element scheme. This scheme ensures the nonnegativity of the discrete solution without any restriction on the transmissibility coefficients. Moreover, it also provides a control on the entropy. The existence of a discrete solution and the convergence of this scheme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to discretizing the model under consideration, we discuss several aspects of the continuous model. First, we highlight in Section 2.1 that the continuous model can be interpreted as the generalized gradient flow of the energy E in a geometry related to optimal transportation constrained by the volume filling condition (2). A reformulation of the problem is then proposed in Section 2.2 in order to make explicit the corresponding Lagrange multiplier, while we introduce in Section 2.3 an entropy production estimate on which the definition for weak solutions and our numerical analysis will rely.…”
Section: Preliminary Considerations On the Continuous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to discretizing the model under consideration, we discuss several aspects of the continuous model. First, we highlight in Section 2.1 that the continuous model can be interpreted as the generalized gradient flow of the energy E in a geometry related to optimal transportation constrained by the volume filling condition (2). A reformulation of the problem is then proposed in Section 2.2 in order to make explicit the corresponding Lagrange multiplier, while we introduce in Section 2.3 an entropy production estimate on which the definition for weak solutions and our numerical analysis will rely.…”
Section: Preliminary Considerations On the Continuous Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of the discrete entropy method [9] for cross-diffusion systems is more recent. Let us cite [1,2] where upstream mobility finite volume and control volume finite elements schemes for a multiphase extension of the porous medium equation are studied. Upwinding is also used in [7] to approximate the solution of a system which is very close to the problem (1) under study, or in [8] for a problem in which nonlocal interactions are also considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upwinding is also used in [7] to approximate the solution of a system which is very close to the problem (1) under study, or in [8] for a problem in which nonlocal interactions are also considered. As a consequence of the upwind choice for the mobility, the schemes presented in [1,2,7] and [8] are first order accurate in space. An natural solution to pass to order two is to rather consider mobilities given by arithmetic means [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of the discrete entropy method [19] for cross-diffusion systems is more recent. Let us cite [1,2] where upstream mobility finite volume and control volume finite element schemes for a multiphase extension of the porous medium equation are studied. Upwinding is also used in [12] to approximate the solution of a system which is very close to the problem (1.1) under study, or in [17] for a problem in which nonlocal interactions are also considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upwinding is also used in [12] to approximate the solution of a system which is very close to the problem (1.1) under study, or in [17] for a problem in which nonlocal interactions are also considered. As a consequence of the upwind choice for the mobility, the schemes presented in [1,2,12] and [17] are first-order accurate in space. A natural solution to pass to order two is to rather consider mobilities given by arithmetic means [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%