2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2019.112477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence of a B-E based finite element method for MHD models on Lipschitz domains

Abstract: We discuss a class of magnetic-electric fields based finite element schemes for stationary magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) systems with two types of boundary conditions. We establish a key L 3 estimate for divergence-free finite element functions for a new type of boundary conditions. With this estimate and a similar one in [21], we rigorously prove the convergence of Picard iterations and the finite element schemes with weak regularity assumptions. These results demonstrate the convergence of the finite element me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above estimates is due to Sobolev inequality Lemma 3.2 and Theorem 1 in [27], stability of the solution Theorem 2.1 and the estimates for u, B. This completes the proof for (2.7) with a simple triangle inequality and projection error estimates for E in Lemma 3.3.…”
Section: Error Estimatessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The above estimates is due to Sobolev inequality Lemma 3.2 and Theorem 1 in [27], stability of the solution Theorem 2.1 and the estimates for u, B. This completes the proof for (2.7) with a simple triangle inequality and projection error estimates for E in Lemma 3.3.…”
Section: Error Estimatessupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Proof. As in [16], the stationary Faraday's law ∇×E h = 0 follows from testing (.c) with C h = ∇×E h , and the magnetic Gauss' law ∇ • B h = 0 then follows from testing (.c) with C h = B h . The proof of the energy law follows from testing (.d) with j h .…”
Section: Nonlinear Schemementioning
confidence: 89%
“…These formulations either eliminate E or j with help of (.f) or (.b). Here, the augmented Lagrangian formulation in [16] seems a natural approach, as it only includes u, p, B and E as unknowns and enforces ∇ • B = 0 without the need for a Lagrange multiplier. Our proposed formulation with both j and E as unknowns tries to use the fewest number of unknown variables for the Hall system while still enforcing the magnetic Gauss's law precisely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a stabilised FEM for stationary MHD is designed in [40] which preserves the divergence free constraints of both the velocity and magnetic fields at the discrete level. We also make note of the recent publications [41,50,38]. A non-conforming approximation of the linearised model is proposed in [39] using a mixed discontinuous Galerkin (DG) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%