2020
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence in non‐associated plasticity and fracture propagation for standard, rate‐dependent, and Cosserat continua

Abstract: The use of pressure‐dependent plasticity models with a non‐associated flow rule causes a loss of the well‐posedness for sufficiently low hardening rates. Apart from a mesh dependence, this can result in poor convergence, or even divergence of the iterative procedure employed to find an equilibrium configuration. This can be aggravated when other nonlinear, dissipative mechanisms are introduced, for instance the propagation of cracks. This is demonstrated rigorously, as well as the regularizing effect of adding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second case which we consider is a fracture propagating due to shear stresses, while being limited by inertial and visco-plastic effects in the domain. 35,36 This case consists of a 500 × 250m domain on which external forces are applied (𝜏 xx = 8.55MPa, 𝜏 yy = 10MPa, 𝜏 xy = 1.8MPa). To prevent stress waves from reflecting from the domain boundaries, absorbing boundary conditions are employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second case which we consider is a fracture propagating due to shear stresses, while being limited by inertial and visco-plastic effects in the domain. 35,36 This case consists of a 500 × 250m domain on which external forces are applied (𝜏 xx = 8.55MPa, 𝜏 yy = 10MPa, 𝜏 xy = 1.8MPa). To prevent stress waves from reflecting from the domain boundaries, absorbing boundary conditions are employed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cosserat continuum introduces an internal length scale c. It removes the ill‐posedness and the ensuing the mesh dependence caused by the nonassociated plasticity, 46–49 and maintains the quadratic convergence of Newton–Raphson schemes used to solve nonlinear boundary value problems 50 …”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonassociated Drucker–Prager plasticity model is used to model the plastic deformations, with the yield function and plastic potential defined as: f=3J2+αspsksg=3J2+βspswith ps the solid pressure (tension positive), J2 the second invariant of the deviatoric stresses in a Cosserat continuum 45,54 and αs, βs, and ks related to the angle of internal friction ϕ, dilatancy angle ψ, and cohesion c through: αs=6sinϕ3sinϕβs=6sinψ3sinψks=c6cosϕ3sinϕ.More implementation details related to the integration of the plastic strain and the used tangential stiffness matrix are given in Ref. 50.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While these works have mainly focused on material softening, surprisingly, little attention has been given to the regularization of nonassociative models. Recent works [26,38,52] on this topic employ rate-dependent and/or Cosserat contin-uum models to obtain mesh-objectivity in non-associative plasticity. Another instance can be found in Ulloa et al [53], where gradient-enhanced plasticity is considered for the same purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%